MHSL82
Well-Known Member
To me, even a baseball stadium or basketball arena is more worthwhile, you can at least make an argument they help surrounding areas. Football games, its 10 dates a year, the fans tailgate, very little benefit. What a scam.
Yep, and the thing is - the formula is not what the surrounding areas make with a stadium or without, because they already have a stadium. The formula is what a new stadium would bring over an old stadium for the surrounding areas. Besides a SB weekend, seems like zilch if you don't include the stadium itself. If they already sell-out, without more seating, renovations aren't bringing more people and therefore bring little to the stadium itself anyways. And I suppose they could justify charging more, but they were going to do that anyway, just not with fake justification.
With a winning Falcons' team, it seems they would have maximized interest and if they lose, a new stadium won't change interest, especially if it was made and started while they were winning. I mean, in a losing team, you could say, sure, the team sucks, but look at these seats! When they are winning, people would come anyway, then when they start to lose, the new stadium is old and the team is no good, benefit lost.