- Thread starter
- #1
devils30mb
King "Marty" Kong
Wonder what are some thoughts here.
What would have happen to the butterfly style if the goalie equipment stayed the same size it was in the earlier days when Roy, Brodeur, Hasek and others first started out. Would we really have the takeoff with the butterfly style today with that size of pads and equipment. I'm not to sure of this because the smaller equipment probably wouldn't help benefit taking away most of the bottom of the net like what they do today.
Today basically all goalies are playing the butterfly style, with Brodeur playing a hybrid style and I would not call it full fledge butterfly (which is why I like Brodeur because he still plays with that reactive style in him). The butterfly style I'm talking about is really just playing the percentages and taking up the bottom of the net making the shooter go high. I'm not to fond of this style because I feel like you are just making the goalie into a robot and continuously play the same moves all the time. You basically won't see the athelicism that Hasek displayed or the reactive style we were all fond of with Brodeur displaying in his prime. This is why quite a few goaltenders now are 6 foot plus in order to take up most of the bottom of the net with their long legs.
This leads me to my other question, do you really need someone who has great raw talent with playing in net or can you make someone who has good mental strength into an average goalie as long as you keep drilling them with the moves and get them to practice over and over and over again. I say mental strength because we know that goalies need this to gain back their composure when a goal is let in that they should of really had.
What would have happen to the butterfly style if the goalie equipment stayed the same size it was in the earlier days when Roy, Brodeur, Hasek and others first started out. Would we really have the takeoff with the butterfly style today with that size of pads and equipment. I'm not to sure of this because the smaller equipment probably wouldn't help benefit taking away most of the bottom of the net like what they do today.
Today basically all goalies are playing the butterfly style, with Brodeur playing a hybrid style and I would not call it full fledge butterfly (which is why I like Brodeur because he still plays with that reactive style in him). The butterfly style I'm talking about is really just playing the percentages and taking up the bottom of the net making the shooter go high. I'm not to fond of this style because I feel like you are just making the goalie into a robot and continuously play the same moves all the time. You basically won't see the athelicism that Hasek displayed or the reactive style we were all fond of with Brodeur displaying in his prime. This is why quite a few goaltenders now are 6 foot plus in order to take up most of the bottom of the net with their long legs.
This leads me to my other question, do you really need someone who has great raw talent with playing in net or can you make someone who has good mental strength into an average goalie as long as you keep drilling them with the moves and get them to practice over and over and over again. I say mental strength because we know that goalies need this to gain back their composure when a goal is let in that they should of really had.