- Thread starter
- #1
Eriko212121
Member
Both guys are still FA's. Anyone else think they would look better than Mac B and Free on the right side?
Both guys are still FA's. Anyone else think they would look better than Mac B and Free on the right side?
thing about going after Hillis, is it could be at the expense one of the back up RBs. Think getting rid of Vickers was because we needed a blocking(4th) TE (who we could use at FB) in Rosario, but the team isn't getting rid of Hanna or the rookie. So to me picking up Hillis means we cut a RB. So Hillis wouldn't just be a FB but a back up HB.and a move like that gives you a Fb ... a goal line threat... a pass protector in the backfield...
and he can catch the ball .....
I like your thinking here. He could be a versatile guy to come in on the goal line. Tanner did not progress from the year before. I kind of like Dunbar as a shifty runner. I still hope Kendial Lawrence is gets a spot before tanner does. The defense would have to account for his speed. It could really open up the big play in the slot.and a move like that gives you a Fb ... a goal line threat... a pass protector in the backfield...
and he can catch the ball .....