pete6835
Buuuuuurp!
CANADIENS AGREE TO TERMS WITH SUBBAN ON EIGHT-YEAR CONTRACT
Canadiens agree to terms with Subban on eight-year contract
Canadiens agree to terms with Subban on eight-year contract
CANADIENS AGREE TO TERMS WITH SUBBAN ON EIGHT-YEAR CONTRACT
Canadiens agree to terms with Subban on eight-year contract
CANADIENS AGREE TO TERMS WITH SUBBAN ON EIGHT-YEAR CONTRACT
Canadiens agree to terms with Subban on eight-year contract
Subban did lead the Habs to the ECF last year. If not for a Price injury it could have very well been Habs vs Kings in the finals.
Subban did lead the Habs to the ECF last year. If not for a Price injury it could have very well been Habs vs Kings in the finals.
You're going to tell me Subban is a one year flash in the pan? ok lol.
I guess you didn't see that Montreal-Boston Series.
Problem is Subban won the most destroyed award, in a shortened season no less, being the Norris Trophy. Award is to be given to the most outstanding defenseman, yet tragically has been given more to the defenseman that has accumulated the most points (redardless if the were accumulated on power-plays, or against teams with the worst goaltending), rather than being a defenseman who actually controls the game. They honestly should create a secondary award named the Bobby Orr Award for the NHL's highest scoring defenseman. That would give more credance back to the Norris for a more truely outstanding defenseman. JMO, but I have heard other analysts propose the same idea.
The Norris has become a joke for this reason alone, I don't even consider it a real trophy anymore. I stopped about the time Blake won in in 1998 when it was painfully obvious he won because he led the league with 23 goals for a defenseman but became one of three NHL players ever to win it with a negative plus/minus rating.
In our generation, the true winners were guys like Bourque, Lidstrom and Chelios, Chara. That's about it.
Salaries are going to go up because the cap is going up. That's why you are seeing star players sign for 9-10 million now. Its all relative.
Not saying Subban is better than Doughty because hes not. But 1) Montreal can't just let him go because it will be really hard to replace him. 2) Hes a Top 5 defenseman in this league.
Not to take anything away from those guys, but the fact that Scott Stevens never won the Norris is a near travesty as that he was one of the most feared defenders in the league during the 90s.
Neidermeyer should have won more than his one, but he was always going to be in the shadow of Lidstrom because of New Jersey's system not allowing him to rack up as many points as Detroits system allowed.
But the fact that Erik Karlsonn won the Norris a couple of years ago as a 20 year old over the likes of Chara & Weber was a joke! What was even funnier was in The Hockey News' season preview issue the following year they were trying to justify Karlsonn's Norris win by claiming he had comparable/better numbers than Bobby Orr & Paul Coffey at the same age, yet never mentioning any defensive zone capabilities. They've completely ignored a defenseman's defensive responsibilities in the equation, which is sad.
during the season Subban started 28.7% of his shifts in the offensive zone, 38.5 in the neutral zone and 32.8 in the defensive zone.
Doughty Started 34.8 in the offensive, 35.9 neutral 29.3% in defensive zone.
Deader you've got way too much time on your hands if you can dig up those kind of stats. And my question would be: What do those statistics that tell us?
Ox