yes, it's not like KU played an extremely tough schedule are anything. And you know, all 9 loss teams are equal!!!!
maybe so but it's irrelevant. Cuse has 5 and that's all we know. As for 9 losses I don't care who the team is - 9 losses is nothing to brag about. It's avg at best and nine loss teams don't win the tournamentSorry but 'Cuse might have 13 losses with Kansas's schedule
Put the Atlantic 10 teams in the Big 12 and most of those teams are NIT bound. The Big 12 and the ACC are the two toughest conferences and no team goes through that bunch without losing some games.
Wrong again! The ACC was so bad you almost had a team go undefeated...
maybe so but it's irrelevant. Cuse has 5 and that's all we know. As for 9 losses I don't care who the team is - 9 losses is nothing to brag about. It's avg at best and nine loss teams don't win the tournament
quick question son ; who the fuck do YOU think you are? Go talk to your boyfriend like that if ya want but not me.Bullshit.
That might be all you know, but you don't speak for the rest of us.
I also happen to know who KU played and who SU played. You can stick your head in the sand and ignore it if you want, but not all wins are the same, and not all losses are the same. Implying they are is utter nonsense.
Also the seeding process isn't about predicting who will win the tournament, it's about what you've done prior to the tournament.
And finally...
UConn lost nine games, got a 3 seed and won it all in 2011
Nova lost 10 games and got an 8 seed, and won it all in 1985
So kindly STFU until you actually know what you're talking about.
Lmao. Idk why this guy creams for the ACC so much. So clueless. Didn't Pitt have 1 top 50 win all regular season due to playing in that shit conference?
quick question son ; who the fuck do YOU think you are? Go talk to your boyfriend like that if ya want but not me.
quick question son ; who the fuck do YOU think you are? Go talk to your boyfriend like that if ya want but not me.
I'm the guy who knows what the fuck he's talking about. You must be the other guy.
Preaching to the choir. I'm done hearing about what Kansas, Kentucky, UNC (to a lesser degree) etc... "could" do. And they shouldn't be rewarded for so many losses regardless of who they came by.
Let's see a real run, big boys.
what a man for protecting your little sister. If your teams didn't suck you wouldn't have to reduce yourselves to this ........ or the 2 of you could just grow upI'll take this one Trolly:
He is the guy who just called your bs post out and, as usual, had the facts to back up exactly WHY it was bs.
what a man for protecting your little sister. If your teams didn't suck you wouldn't have to reduce yourselves to this ........ or the 2 of you could just grow up
Well to be clear, I haven't heard anyone talking about what Kentucky or UNC could do since mid February. And neither team is getting any favors when it comes to seeding if the current projections are accurate.
And Kansas isn't being rewarded for their losses. They're being rewarded for their wins. Perhaps you hadn't noticed, but KU has more Top 50 RPI wins than any other team in the country. That is what they're being rewarded for.
Precisely why I take the indexes with a grain of salt. Win or lose KU manages to hover around the 1 spot. Helluva a model KU has though. I don't knock them for their scheduling, only their 9 losses.
If you noticed KU was ranked 10th prior to losing (though they got a W over an okay, OK St team, after the polling) in the Big 12 Tourney semis. That doesn't scream 2 seed to me. I can find 8 teams more deserving of Kansas...maybe more.To me, KU is a borderline 3 seed.