msgkings322
I'm just here to troll everyone
An old fave, we beat the Dogs! 4 in a row...
That's Osich drinking the milk.
That's Osich drinking the milk.
An old fave, we beat the Dogs! 4 in a row...
That's Osich drinking the milk.
(If my post get's taken down, so be it)
Night gents
Poor dog...I'm gonna go beat something now...
Depends upon who you talk to, some would say we put him on a peddle stool and that when facing los doyers his spincktster gets tight.Actually he owns them for his whole career
As long as my alts are alive I shall NEVER fade....I think their usernames probably expired after inactivity. GP's doesn't show up anymore, but there was a long story behind that, which I'm forgetting.
Even Tzill is fading!
Nah, he used to rip me pretty good sometimes. And I usually deserved it.The only two posters I really thought were the same was gp and tzill. They tended to carry the same "confidence" on the ESPN board.
Nah, he used to rip me pretty good sometimes. And I usually deserved it.
I keep waiting for the spell to break, but Krukow broke it down on morning radio. Pitchers get older, and lose their velocity, and some never figure out how to pitch effectively in a whole new way (Timmy). But many do. Cain is a talented veteran, who seems to have figured out how to get guys out with location and speed changes. That's all Maddux ever did (not that he's Maddux but you get the point).
So the question is...if the dude finished the year 10-9 with a 4.05 ERA....do you re-sign him? I suppose for a 2 year $20 mil type deal why not?
Well, your hypo forgets to include that we really only have two options with Cain in 2018 --
1. Pay him $7MM to go away or
2. Pay him $20MM to pitch one year.
I hope he pitches well enough to make that a difficult decision.
Maybe we pay him 7 then he re-signs for 2 and 22? He ends up with more $ and we get one more year of him?
I don't think you can offer the QO to a player under contract.Or, what if the Giants paid the $7M, then extended a QO, and either he comes back making a few million more or we get a draft pick out of him?
But if we paid him the 7, he would no longer be under contract.I don't think you can offer the QO to a player under contract.
Now I'm curious, has a player been bought out of a contract and then given a QO?But if we paid him the 7, he would no longer be under contract.
I don't belive so.Now I'm curious, has a player been bought out of a contract and then given a QO?
We need Marco on this. But I'd be willing to bet that once you buy someone out, you can't QO him.But if we paid him the 7, he would no longer be under contract.
Marco did leave us (sort of, Stokes created a thread to reference) with some tools. I looked up COTs (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/transactions-glossary) and this is what I could find:We need Marco on this. But I'd be willing to bet that once you buy someone out, you can't QO him.