polfnikufesin
New Member
But here's the question: Could you deal with a couple turnovers in exchange for more aggressive play and TD's instead of FG's?
But here's the question: Could you deal with a couple turnovers in exchange for more aggressive play and TD's instead of FG's?
But here's the question: Could you deal with a couple turnovers in exchange for more aggressive play and TD's instead of FG's?
like Romo for example?
It depends on how many turnovers to td's. Then we have to talk about when are these turnovers coming. If they are crunchtime turnovers that would otherwise be considered clutch plays, then they can keep the aggressive play.
You didn't have to take it to the extreme! lol
My motto when playing poker is: Willing to die in order to live!
Is this 49ers offense willing to die come playoff time? Or will they continue to be timid and scared?
Guys... bringing up streaks like this taunts the football gods and means 4 or 5 turnovers next game...
I've been thinking like that ever since they drafted Alex. There is no "next level" for him.
But here's the question: Could you deal with a couple turnovers in exchange for more aggressive play and TD's instead of FG's?
was posting in this manner earlier this season (ie i agree), but TRYING not to post this anymore. as someone pointed out, its not unreasonable to give him a FULL off-season with Harbaugh and Staff.
because the unit around him will also get better, i'd think his stat line would improve a little next year? but for HIM to take the "next step up", wouldn't bet on it.
still view him as our stop gap as opposed to 'future', so in that light i'm glad he's a solid 'stop gap'.
It was a hypothetical question dipshit...lmfao
But here's the question: Could you deal with a couple turnovers in exchange for more aggressive play and TD's instead of FG's?