msgkings322
I'm just here to troll everyone
Oh so you get a point even if you get the winner wrong but the number of games right. Interesting.If either wins in 7 games bc you predicted the series to go 7. Stakes picked Boston in 6.
Oh so you get a point even if you get the winner wrong but the number of games right. Interesting.If either wins in 7 games bc you predicted the series to go 7. Stakes picked Boston in 6.
Yeah I don’t like it but next year we can switch it upOh so you get a point even if you get the winner wrong but the number of games right. Interesting.
Yeah as much as it pains me i look at it like you first have to have the winner right and if you do then you have a shot at the bonus point.Yeah I don’t like it but next year we can switch it up
How the fuck am I so low after predicting the finals? The system is rigged@Stakesarehigh has it wrapped up unless @msgkings322 gets Boston or Dallas in 7 then we have a tie.
If @msgkings322 beat me, he must have cheated.
CheaterYessir!
Is this Trump?If @msgkings322 beat me, he must have cheated.
How the fuck am I so low after predicting the finals? The system is rigged
Fight predicted this which was a good bonus but it should be...IF you predict the correct winner you also get a point if you predict correct number of games. Maybe that's what he meantAre we doing the old name how many games they’ll win it in piece as a part of the prediction? You could do 1 point for a series win and then 2-3 bonus points for calling the right number of games.
It was what I meant but I didn’t make it terribly clear. I leaned too much on the word “bonus”Fight predicted this which was a good bonus but it should be...IF you predict the correct winner you also get a point if you predict correct number of games. Maybe that's what he meant
The system was rigged!!!
After I started the scoring I felt dumb bc I knew that's what we should have done. Makes sense.It was what I meant but I didn’t make it terribly clear. I leaned too much on the word “bonus”