• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Game Thread: #1E OREGON DUCKS vs colorado buffaloes 10PM EST on FS1

michaeljordan_fan

Well-Known Member
15,335
3,318
293
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Never said won the natty but goes on to the conversation, back before 98 there were not actual title games, so the conversation went on.

Are you new to CFB?

Pre-BCS years where both were outside the top5 going back to 1960.

1996
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1981
1977
1969
1968
1966
1964
1962
1961
1960

15 times in 37 years they were not in the conversation. A far cry from the 1% you claimed. Are you new to CFB?
 

michaeljordan_fan

Well-Known Member
15,335
3,318
293
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We played on Thursdays when it was a national event type game and still a big deal. Now you couldn't make us play a home game on a Thursday and you would get shot in the state of Alabama if you tried to schedule a Friday game and interfered with High School football.

Auburn - Kentucky is a "national event type game"?

:pound::pound::pound:
 

Gatorchip

Well-Known Member
20,115
2,318
173
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Location
Boston
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,015.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
This game may be overshadowed by other HS football games.
 

WhiteMamba

John: 8:36
37,953
2,114
293
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Location
Portland
Hoopla Cash
$ 61.19
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We played on Thursdays when it was a national event type game and still a big deal. Now you couldn't make us play a home game on a Thursday and you would get shot in the state of Alabama if you tried to schedule a Friday game and interfered with High School football.
Its disappointing that this is where the PAC 12’s current place in cfb has landed. Best chance at eyeballs on one of the conferences front runners on a Friday.
 

michaeljordan_fan

Well-Known Member
15,335
3,318
293
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Its disappointing that this is where the PAC 12’s current place in cfb has landed. Best chance at eyeballs on one of the conferences front runners on a Friday.

ACC is kind of in the same boat.
 

Moab

Well-Known Member
17,045
5,554
533
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 735.01
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'd say that a "series" doesn't make a rivalry.
A rivalry is something where each teams has fucked over the other teams chances at a Championship multiple times over generations.

Not sure I ever saw that happen with Nebraska/Colorado.
So, it's just a "series"

I think that 5th down game was the only one I recall pertaining to that scenario.

Thought I'd bring it up since we're in scenario village 2019.
 

Red_Alert

^^ Privileged ^^
92,301
8,234
533
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,956.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Pre-BCS years where both were outside the top5 going back to 1960.

1996
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1981
1977
1969
1968
1966
1964
1962
1961
1960

15 times in 37 years they were not in the conversation. A far cry from the 1% you claimed. Are you new to CFB?

Either you don't read very well, or you just like moving goalposts.
You're using Final Polls.
His point was one or both were in the NC conversation at some point during the season.
Obviously the loser of OU/NU was going to drop. If they lost their bowl they were going to drop again.

If you go by being in the NC conversation at some point during the season?

Highest AP Ranking

1996: Nebraska #1.
1992: Neither Top 5
1991: Oklahoma #5
1990: Nebraska #3, Oklahoma #4
1989: Nebraska #3,
1988: Nebraska #2, Oklahoma #3
1981: Nebraska #4, Oklahoma #2
1977: Oklahoma #1
1969: Neither Top 5
1968: Oklahoma #4
1966: Nebraska #3
1964: Nebraska #4, Oklahoma #2
1962: Neither Top 5
1961: Neither Top 5
1960: Neither Top 5

So just 5 of the 37 pre-BCS years did not have either Nebraska or Oklahoma in the NC conversation.

This is fun. Let's do Oregon.
.
 

Red_Alert

^^ Privileged ^^
92,301
8,234
533
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,956.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think that 5th down game was the only one I recall pertaining to that scenario.

Thought I'd bring it up since we're in scenario village 2019.

The 5th down game was Colorado/Missouri.
.
 

michaeljordan_fan

Well-Known Member
15,335
3,318
293
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Either you don't read very well, or you just like moving goalposts.
You're using Final Polls.
His point was one or both were in the NC conversation at some point during the season.
Obviously the loser of OU/NU was going to drop. If they lost their bowl they were going to drop again.

If you go by being in the NC conversation at some point during the season?

Highest AP Ranking

1996: Nebraska #1.
1992: Neither Top 5
1991: Oklahoma #5
1990: Nebraska #3, Oklahoma #4
1989: Nebraska #3,
1988: Nebraska #2, Oklahoma #3
1981: Nebraska #4, Oklahoma #2
1977: Oklahoma #1
1969: Neither Top 5
1968: Oklahoma #4
1966: Nebraska #3
1964: Nebraska #4, Oklahoma #2
1962: Neither Top 5
1961: Neither Top 5
1960: Neither Top 5

So just 5 of the 37 pre-BCS years did not have either Nebraska or Oklahoma in the NC conversation.

This is fun. Let's do Oregon.
.

LOL, why would anyone care if OU/NU was ranked in the top 5 the first few weeks of the season? Gameday rankings are meaningless.
 

Red_Alert

^^ Privileged ^^
92,301
8,234
533
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,956.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
LOL, why would anyone care if OU/NU was ranked in the top 5 the first few weeks of the season? Gameday rankings are meaningless.

You're going backwards, stupid.

You're now implying those rankings were all just "the first few weeks of the season"?

You're flaming idiocy is not worth going through every year to determine what each were ranked in each week, just to shove it straight up your ass as usual.

Are you trying to convince the forum that 1) Alabama, 2) Clemson, 3) Ohio St, 4) Georgia, 5) LSU are not part of the NC discussion right now?

That's using your goalposts criteria of Top 5 and omitting 6) Oklahoma who many also have in their NC discussion.

Die on the hill, ducky. I don't give a shit.
.
 

NU_FTW

I DGAF
15,469
2,442
173
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Location
Nebraska
Hoopla Cash
$ 6,200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Either you don't read very well, or you just like moving goalposts.
You're using Final Polls.
His point was one or both were in the NC conversation at some point during the season.
Obviously the loser of OU/NU was going to drop. If they lost their bowl they were going to drop again.

If you go by being in the NC conversation at some point during the season?

Highest AP Ranking

1996: Nebraska #1.
1992: Neither Top 5
1991: Oklahoma #5
1990: Nebraska #3, Oklahoma #4
1989: Nebraska #3,
1988: Nebraska #2, Oklahoma #3
1981: Nebraska #4, Oklahoma #2
1977: Oklahoma #1
1969: Neither Top 5
1968: Oklahoma #4
1966: Nebraska #3
1964: Nebraska #4, Oklahoma #2
1962: Neither Top 5
1961: Neither Top 5
1960: Neither Top 5

So just 5 of the 37 pre-BCS years did not have either Nebraska or Oklahoma in the NC conversation.

This is fun. Let's do Oregon.
.
:10::agree::suds::dingdingding:
Thanks for handling my light-work had to go buy a battery for the van and get more stuff for my daughters birthday party tomorrow!!
 

NU_FTW

I DGAF
15,469
2,442
173
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Location
Nebraska
Hoopla Cash
$ 6,200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You're going backwards, stupid.

You're now implying those rankings were all just "the first few weeks of the season"?

You're flaming idiocy is not worth going through every year to determine what each were ranked in each week, just to shove it straight up your ass as usual.

Are you trying to convince the forum that 1) Alabama, 2) Clemson, 3) Ohio St, 4) Georgia, 5) LSU are not part of the NC discussion right now?

That's using your goalposts of Top 5 and omitting 6) Oklahoma who many also have in their NC discussion.

Die on the hill, ducky. I don't give a shit.
.
LOL 0regon fans dont do college football, they are like UCF fans they really dont know what the fuck they are talking about
 

michaeljordan_fan

Well-Known Member
15,335
3,318
293
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You're going backwards, stupid.

You're now implying those rankings were all just "the first few weeks of the season"?

You're flaming idiocy is not worth going through every year to determine what each were ranked in each week, just to shove it straight up your ass as usual.

Are you trying to convince the forum that 1) Alabama, 2) Clemson, 3) Ohio St, 4) Georgia, 5) LSU are not part of the NC discussion right now?

That's using your goalposts of Top 5 and omitting 6) Oklahoma who many also have in their NC discussion.

Die on the hill, ducky. I don't give a shit.
.

There is no meaningful NC discussion until at LEAST the CFP rankings are announced. Even then, it's completely meaningless until the final rankings.
 

michaeljordan_fan

Well-Known Member
15,335
3,318
293
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
LMFAO @ all the butthurt Nebraska fans coming out of the woodwork to claim they are superior than a team that just got done thumping them twice.
 

Red_Alert

^^ Privileged ^^
92,301
8,234
533
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,956.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Fucking Mike Riley beat the Ducks at Nebraska. Wrap your head around that.
There is no meaningful NC discussion until at LEAST the CFP rankings are announced. Even then, it's completely meaningless until the final rankings.

Like I said.

Die on the hill, dumbass.
 
Top