• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

MLB Daily Thread: 08-08-17: Trout gets 1,000 hit on 26th b-day

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Because I looked at a larger sample size (the entire season). You've cut it down to twenty-plus games so that the numbers fit your argument.
I was following your lead pal.
 

PolarVortex

Nanook of the North
16,029
6,346
533
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Location
Mt Rainier
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
41hBoGswqQL.jpg
Is that a strand of DNA commonly found in the gays?
 

PolarVortex

Nanook of the North
16,029
6,346
533
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Location
Mt Rainier
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
jason vargas:

1st half - 12-3 2.62 ERA 1.147 WHIP
2nd half - 1-2 5.79 ERA 1.714 WHIP
Classic case of rising to the occasion in his walk year. Anyone that throws money at Vargas this winter deserves what they get. I hope to God it isn't the Mariners.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,611
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
but 5 starts in the 2nd half (for Santana/Berrios) isn't a small sample size? Santana's FIP/xFIP are each about 1.5 runs higher than his ERA, so plenty of regression is to be expected. Berrios has a 3.99 FIP, though his xFIP is 4.54.

No, it is, but still, if I was trying to debunk a they've faced cupcakes point, I wouldn't say, "I know they faced the Twins who suck at pitching, but they faced Berrios and Santana who started out great, but have also been sucking at pitching recently." It doesn't help the counterpoint.

Also, Berrios is half of the two he mentioned. How's Santana been?
 
Last edited:

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,611
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I was following your lead pal.


On another thread I said that I'd looked at the Astros' season and they've faced cupcake pitching. Today, I noticed HOU's post-ASB numbers and used the same full-season team pitching samples to determine that it's been ultra-cupcake since the ASB.

You tried to debunk that theory with Santana and Berrios but fell flat on your face and have been grasping at straws since. Now, I might have led you there, but it wasn't by example.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
On another thread I said that I'd looked at the Astros' season and they've faced cupcake pitching. Today, I noticed HOU's post-ASB numbers and used the same full-season team pitching samples to determine that it's been ultra-cupcake since the ASB.

You tried to debunk that theory with Santana and Berrios but fell flat on your face and have been grasping at straws since. Now, I might have led you there, but it wasn't by example.
That is an incorrect summary of events. But you already knew that.
 

PolarVortex

Nanook of the North
16,029
6,346
533
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Location
Mt Rainier
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Slinky is pretty determined to discredit the Astros. Might as well let him have it.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Slinky is pretty determined to discredit the Astros. Might as well let him have it.
His first reaction after I said that you would have to dig deeper in order to really make an accurate assessment of the Astros opponents, was "Absolutely a fair point" but since he's obviously bi-polar, he couldn't stand for that.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,611
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
His first reaction after I said that you would have to dig deeper in order to really make an accurate assessment of the Astros opponents, was "Absolutely a fair point" but since he's obviously bi-polar, he couldn't stand for that.

No, you acknowledged that I took a pretty high-level glance, which I agreed with.

You then proceeded to dig deeper and brought up Berrios and Santana, which supported my claim.

I've said that, based on the Astros' opponents' team ERAs, they've faced a ridiculously cupcake pitching schedule and I think their offense to some extent is overrated. I've provided as much statistical support as I'm inclined to. You've provided nothing that refutes a cupcake schedule, yet you press on.

You could be right, I could be wrong, but everything I've looked at says otherwise.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,611
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Slinky is pretty determined to discredit the Astros. Might as well let him have it.

Not really. I just made an observation. They seem to have faced very weak pitching thus far.

You and Sox haven't presented anything to refute my observation, but are pretty determined to discredit it. I might as well let you have that, I guess.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
No, you acknowledged that I took a pretty high-level glance at who the've faced and noticed that they've faced an exceedingly cupcake pitching schedule.

You pointed out that it was a high-level glimpse, which I agreed with.

You then proceeded to dig deeper and brought up Berrios and Santana, which supported my claim.

I've said that, based on the Astros' opponents' team ERAs, they've faced a ridiculously cupcake pitching schedule and I think their offense to some extent is overrated. I've provided as much statistical support as I'm inclined to. You've provided nothing that refutes a cupcake schedule, yet you press on.

You could be right, I could be wrong, but everything I've looked at says otherwise.
I dug for a second and noticed Santana and Berrios, who had below league average ERAs when the Astros faced them. So I used the larger sample size of their performances leading up to facing the Astros, you decided that the smaller sample size of how they have done since then is more accurate.

I also never took a stance one way or the other. I merely said that we don't have enough information to determine whether or not they have faced a cupcake pitching schedule.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

PolarVortex

Nanook of the North
16,029
6,346
533
Joined
Feb 28, 2014
Location
Mt Rainier
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not really. I just made an observation. They seem to have faced very weak pitching thus far.

You and Sox haven't presented anything to refute my observation, but are pretty determined to discredit it. I might as well let you have that, I guess.
They have cooled to 13-13 in their last 26 while facing only two opponents with a won-loss record over .500. Injuries are clearly costing them big time. Prior to that they went 58-27. A team simply cannot get to 58-27 on good luck and good fortune alone. If you are going to base that 85-game record on them facing poor pitching, then you may as well accept the fact that everyone in the AL is facing crappy pitching, which basically neutralizes your argument.
 

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,611
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I dug for a second and noticed Santana and Berrios, who had below league average ERAs when the Astros faced them. So I used the larger sample size of their performances leading up to facing the Astros, you decided that the smaller sample size of how they have done since then is more accurate.

No, I cited Santana's and Berrios' performances since the start of June. That's two plus months - a sample of about 16% of a pitcher's season.

I also never took a stance one way or the other. I merely said that we don't have enough information to determine whether or not they have faced a cupcake pitching schedule.

With that in mind, I suppose we also don't have enough information to deduce that the Astros' offense is historically relevant or head-and-shoulders above the other AL playoff contenders, which are the points I was questioning in the first place.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

Attachments

  • upload_2017-8-8_13-23-10.png
    upload_2017-8-8_13-23-10.png
    36.6 KB · Views: 1

SlinkyRedfoot

Well-Known Member
40,582
8,611
533
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
Cripple Creek
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
They have cooled to 13-13 in their last 26 while facing only two opponents with a won-loss record over .500. Injuries are clearly costing them big time.

Or, they've been overrated, playing over their heads, and their record is normalizing.

Prior to that they went 58-27. A team simply cannot get to 58-27 on good luck and good fortune alone.

Good luck and fortune alone? That's what I said they did it on? You're the one that loves "links," so how about providing one?

I've always maintained that they have a good offense, just that I feel it's being overrated based on stats compiled against shitty pitching staffs.

If you are going to base that 85-game record on them facing poor pitching, then you may as well accept the fact that everyone in the AL is facing crappy pitching, which basically neutralizes your argument.

That assumes that through those 85 games that everyone in the AL faced the same pitching the Astros have, which isn't the case. At least I took the time to review who they've faced and how those pitching staffs' team ERAs look relative to the rest of baseball.
 

soxfan1468927

Well-Known Member
7,001
978
113
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
603
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,185.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
No, I cited Santana's and Berrios' performances since the start of June. That's two plus months - a sample of about 16% of a pitcher's season.



With that in mind, I suppose we also don't have enough information to deduce that the Astros' offense is historically relevant or head-and-shoulders above the other AL playoff contenders, which are the points I was questioning in the first place.
Fair enough. I did say that it could work in reverse. My only point was that looking at simply the overall team ERAs wasn't enough information to deduce whether or not they faced cupcake pitching.
 
Top