- Thread starter
- #1
Mistaken4193
REGISTERED GUMP!!!
That the Heisman should given out after the Season is over. No way Deshaun Watson isn't the best player.
Ditto Charlie WardCam Robinson and Johnathon Allen should give back their awards as well
Ive said that Robinson didn't deserve the outland and that our Freshman RT outplayed him, but Johnathan Allen earned his.Cam Robinson and Johnathon Allen should give back their awards as well
Stupid bull shit award now anyway to be honest. It really is a beauty pageant. Garbage award for garbage time stats.That the Heisman should given out after the Season is over. No way Deshaun Watson isn't the best player.
That the Heisman should given out after the Season is over. No way Deshaun Watson isn't the best player.
Been saying this since Reggie Bush won. After the NC game, there wouldn't have been one person not vote for Vince Young. Not one. Hell, Pete Carroll would have voted for VY.
OU fans know how you feel. VY got royally screwed just like Josh Heupel did when he outplayed Chris Weinke (who was held scoreless!) in our game for the 2000 National Championship. OU won the NC because of Heupel carrying the team but Weinke got the Heisman.
I had Brees and LT at the top of my ballot. Put Brees on either of those 2 teams and they win the title.
...That expanding the playoffs would be fucking stupid as it would only add a bunch of undeserving teams, creating more blowouts and more mismatches.
Three loss teams do not belong in the playoffs, outside of Penn State what deserving team was left out of the playoffs? Oklahoma?Or, it could add in teams that belong but were left out.
Three loss teams do not belong in the playoffs, outside of Penn State what deserving team was left out of the playoffs? Oklahoma?
Three loss teams do not belong in the playoffs, outside of Penn State what deserving team was left out of the playoffs? Oklahoma?
This is an unusual situation. You have a conference champ that lost to a high rated team from another conference. The committee would have a hard time justifiying Oklahoma over Ohio State with Oklahoma losing at home to Ohio State. I argued from the beginning that Penn State should have been in over OSU and that a conference championship and a head to head win should negate the one loss difference.Penn St. belonged, they were the B1G champs and beat tOSU head to head. While I don't think we belonged, a lot of folks were saying USC should have been in because of the 8 game win streak and having beaten both teams who played in the PAC CCG.
Oklahoma started 1-2 then went on to finish 11-2 and won their conference.
The fact that 2 conference champs were left out would be a good start in determining what other teams may have belonged.
The problem with only 4 teams in the playoff is that it doesn't really take into consideration that college football teams tend to evolve (or devolve) as the season progresses. Every season we see huge changes in the polls because of this.
This is an unusual situation. You have a conference champ that lost to a high rated team from another conference. The committee would have a hard time justifiying Oklahoma over Ohio State with Oklahoma losing at home to Ohio State. I argued from the beginning that Penn State should have been in over OSU and that a conference championship and a head to head win should negate the one loss difference.
But honestly, who loses to Pitt? You lose to Pitt you shouldn't be in the playoffs.
And it's sad.Stupid bull shit award now anyway to be honest. It really is a beauty pageant. Garbage award for garbage time stats.