I have no issue with Sherman continuing the play, it was wise to do so, but that doesn't mean the call shouldn't have been made. Of he stopped playing and the kick got off theres a good chance it's made, if it's missed they get another shot because he's offsidesI'm just saying in that situation wouldn't any defender (regardless of the team) do the same thing when there is no whistle? If it was a QB about to throw the ball and the defender was offside wouldn't he still try to sack the QB if there was no whistle? Or is the expectation that the player should just allow a free play?
By the way, according to the official box score of the NFL they did call it defensive offsides. But then they also noted unabated to the kicker. So that is a bit confusing.
1-10-SEA 35 03) 2-D.Carpenter 53 yard field goal is No Good, Short, Center-65-G.Sanborn, Holder-6-C.Schmidt. PENALTY on SEA-25-R.Sherman, Defensive Offside, 5 yards, enforced at SEA 35 - No Play. Unabated to the kicker.
Look on the bright side, at least no-one vaulted over the long-snapper...
Its still roughing the kicker. The Lead Official and NFL has already said they screwed up. On top of that you had the delay of game penalty that was on the refs.again, you don't get to make up your own reality.
There's a better reverse angle floating around that shows it even better.
again, you don't get to make up your own reality.
There's a better reverse angle floating around that shows it even better.
Its still roughing the kicker. The Lead Official and NFL has already said they screwed up.
On top of that you had the delay of game penalty that was on the refs.
I agree with this statement. Just sucks to see a team benefit 3 games because of it. Oh well time to move on. Its been an issue for years and no changes have been made....yet the refs still choked. Time to pay for full time refs, the NFL just might be able to afford it.
Hmm. Question for you.
If the foot was drawn back for kicking. How could he have stopped the motion of kicking it? Still would have flagged it for Roughness
False, I will stick with the people that make up the NFL and Rules. Both said they were wrong. On top of that he was offsides. LOLNot if he gets the ball first. He got the ball first.
Absolutely, agree 100%. Much more egregious error.
Because if the ball is touched first, the kicker isn't off limits.
Just sucks to see a team benefit 3 games because of it.
False, if the ball was in the air then yes. It was still on the ground. NFL and Lead Official already said they missed the call. U wont win this argument.Because if the ball is touched first, the kicker isn't off limits.
It wasn't, and I'm pretty sure that doesn't hold up on a play that has been whistled dead.
Because if the ball is touched first, the kicker isn't off limits.
False, if the ball was in the air then yes. It was still on the ground. NFL and Lead Official already said they missed the call. U wont win this argument.