tabascojet
king of cake
Targeting 

I don't think it was interference or targeting. How the fuck you supposed to tackle somebody that's damn near sitting on the ground without hitting them high?
How did you fare today?come on VANDYPANTS!
Thats the point. if they are down, you arent supposed to tackle them and no matter what you arent supposed to come diving in like a missile with your helmet leading the way.I don't think it was interference or targeting. How the fuck you supposed to tackle somebody that's damn near sitting on the ground without hitting them high?
Thats the point. if they are down, you arent supposed to tackle them and no matter what you arent supposed to come diving in like a missile with your helmet leading the way.
So you get to madden big hit in the head every returner who doesn't call for fair catch?
That's where I'm at. He had about 2 yards of space when he caught it and didn't call a fair catch. Bad decision that'll get your fucking head knocked off but I don't think it should have been penalized. It would have impossible to not hit him high at that point imo.Runners are not defenseless and this guy was not defenseless either. They give him the option for a fair catch for defense.
Bullshit call IMO.
a 2 second gust of wind and a 5 minute sprinkle so far.. it's really kicking our butts right here... on a side note.. Neither one of my cats will leave my side today.. i wonder if they know something i don'tHow did you fare today?
no, but the guy was squatting. What are you suppose to do, let him recover get up to his feet and run first? It's fucking football. This is a shitty rule. has been and will be until they change this ejection shit.So you get to madden big hit in the head every returner who doesn't call for fair catch?
on a guy whose knee was down. and for the leading tackler he should know not to lead with the helmet.He had the option to call for a fair catch.
It's his own damn fault. He chose not to use the defense given to him. All the other guy did was make a tackle.