deanpet21
Well-Known Member
With Cravens this would mean the Riley and Foster will be out in passing situations. That is a good thing. The most logical choice was Billings for NT but I understand why they went here. He is a safety. SS.
So we went into this draft with one of the worst D-lines in the NFL, and we are apparently going to come out of this draft with a #3 WR, a backup OLB.... AND???
AWESOME!!!
For a guy who likes to bitch about not building through the draft....you're bitching a lot about a team that is building through the draft
Dude, IM all for building through the draft. But lets be real... when you have no D-line, and you draft a WR and a situational OLB with your first two picks..... You have to at least begin to question.. what are we trying to build.
We better score alot of points is all I can say.
Understand SM is looking at this from several years out and building a team long-term. He may feel Cravens can be a star but Billings may just be very good.
Didnt want Billings, if we never draft another Baylor player Im good with that. IN a bubble, I was good with the Doctson pick. But as i have said, we walking into this draft with a bottom five D-line. And we are going to walk out with a bottom five D-line.
You have to wonder what is going to happen with the line at this point. This is the danger of building only through the draft, you will always have holes until you plug them with free agents. I want to build through the draft but you cannot neglect free agency like most people on here wanted. Its not SM fault that there was a run on D Linemen. Thats the thing with the draft....you have little to no control of what is going to happen. Its more of a crap shoot than free agency in my opinion. Hopefully we address RB, Center and DL sooner than later. We still have no true FS on the team which is strange.
I trust SM but confused.
You think our dline stinks and you didn't want Billings? lol. SM believes the dline is not as bad as you think Shark. Cravens is a solid pick.