ehb5
HTTR
The fact that you can't understand that some people can agree on an ultimate conclusion but differ on the reasons for agreeing on that conclusion is mind-boggling. Happens all the time. Ever read some rulings by a court of appeal or a supreme court? Some judges / justices agree to affirm or reverse a decision, but sometimes offer different reasons supporting that decision. Same thing here and this basic, common sense principle was explained by jy above.
I absolutely understand that. What you DON'T understand is that conjecture over why somebody did something is not evidence. It's your own personal conjecture. You claimed something was obvious yet have no evidence to support it. Nice job.
