- Thread starter
- #1
bbirish73
Active Member
would he be in the Heisman conversation if he orchestrated a come from behind victory against Clemson? He does throw some interceptions but the dude has been pretty spectacular as a red shirt freshman.
I think it's pronounced TheesmanHeisman, what's that?
He has been better then the Top 3 QB's this year(Lynch, Geoff and Cook.).would he be in the Heisman conversation if he orchestrated a come from behind victory against Clemson? He does throw some interceptions but the dude has been pretty spectacular as a red shirt freshman.
what's the consensus at this point on who should be our main qb next year? personally i let kizer head this team. i can't see sitting him after the year he's had and i think zaire would be a great backup to throw in the mix.
I think it should be Kizer. He has more experience and he has now built a bond with these guys. Kelly will be in a tough spot next year. I think 1 transfers after this year who doesn't win the spot. Now Kizer knows he can play. Before he didn't know. Its going be tough.what's the consensus at this point on who should be our main qb next year? personally i let kizer head this team. i can't see sitting him after the year he's had and i think zaire would be a great backup to throw in the mix.
Oh I know it... that's such a tough call. I'm not sure though, because Texas was such a lopsided affair. Coach did start Zaire so I'm curious what he saw in him over Kizer absent any 'experience' factor(s)? I think Kizer probably, but Zaire earned the starting job and only lost it due to injury.
Best QB starts the 2nd half.
There's my compromise. I'd hate to see either one of them leave for lack of PT when healthy.