Julio Jones

[romeo212000]

I'm getting nervous about this. I'm not finding anything that's optimistic about him, and even one who thinks he may be limited to a decoy role. If I don't play him I've got Benjamin and Stills to choose from. I'm currently up by 41 with all my guys to go. What do you guys think? Play Julio if he's active, or be safe and bench him?

 

[beantownmaniac]

I just saw it looks like he may sit out and get healthy for next week vs the Saints. Stills is up against the Bears and that's who I would play.

 

[leftypower]

Weather is going to be crappy in CHI, so I'd go with Benjamin. If H. Douglas is available on waiver I'd go get him now. ....

 

[romeo212000]

I've already got him, but I'm thinking Stills might be the better play over Douglas.

 

[TREFF]

I've already got him, but I'm thinking Stills might be the better play over Douglas.

Jimmy Grahaam, the hands down safest play in New Orleans, had had back to back stinkers. I'd much rather roll the dice with Douglas, than to hope the Saints suddenly find offense, and that it isn't through Graham.

 

[romeo212000]

Jimmy Grahaam, the hands down safest play in New Orleans, had had back to back stinkers. I'd much rather roll the dice with Douglas, than to hope the Saints suddenly find offense, and that it isn't through Graham.

The safest bet might honestly be Benjamin at WR2 and J. Hill at flex. Question is, if Jones does go do you risk playing him given that he might kind of be a decoy.

 

[TREFF]

No. . I'm not playing Jones in any league. Julio may be a studs but if he's not % 100? No way. He may be the 4th highest scoring WR in standard leagues. . But approximately 50 percent of his points came in three weeks. Which means in about 10 other weeks where he was % 100, he was lackluster. I can't imagine a less than 100% Julio being better than any of your other options