- Thread starter
- #1
OregonDucks
Oregon Is Faster
Over his unbeaten Buckeyes not getting any respect. Bro, you had a 2 loss team in the National championship game. This ain't Florida (SEC) anymore Urbs.
One loss...
Les miles got a 2 loss team in. "Undefeated in regulation"
shhh...don't let facts destroy his narrative. He's much more entertaining if you let him get the 1st 4 or 5 posts in his own thread.
Over his unbeaten Buckeyes not getting any respect. Bro, you had a 2 loss team in the National championship game. This ain't Florida (SEC) anymore Urbs.
he bitches about it being a flawed system...he wasn't bitching when that same system put him in against OSU instead of a rematch with Mich
hahaahahahaahahahahashhh...don't let facts destroy his narrative. He's much more entertaining if you let him get the 1st 4 or 5 posts in his own thread.
The system was not correct because of the outcomes of the games.That's true, however, the system was correct as both Ohio State and Michigan suffered beat downs. That said, I don't see any lack of respect as Ohio State is ranked nr3 and has not played a top 10 team in two years. Both FSU and Alabama have so what's the big deal?
The system was not correct because of the outcomes of the games.
So all that matters is the ranking of the teams they play? Using that FSU has 1 more than tOSU this year. One is not much for bragging. And Bama has zero this year? I am speaking of current rankings.
The system was not correct because of the outcomes of the games.
So all that matters is the ranking of the teams they play? Using that FSU has 1 more than tOSU this year. One is not much for bragging. And Bama has zero this year? I am speaking of current rankings.
using current rankings instead of rankings when the teams played = fail!
wat...
Using the rankings when teams played is really really dumb... It's like saying Miami over UF was a great win...
Here's a little hypothetical example for you
Team A #1 (undefeated) plays team B who is #7 (with 1 loss)
Team A wins, dropping team B to #14 in the polls
So let me get this straight...By your logic, team A no longer has a top10 win anymore, since they won against team B.
Here's a little hypothetical example for you
Team A #1 (undefeated) plays team B who is #7 (with 1 loss)
Team A wins, dropping team B to #14 in the polls
So let me get this straight...By your logic, team A no longer has a top10 win anymore, since they won against team B.
I mean it does matter where the team was ranked when you played them. But it matters just as much how the team finishes. Or is Northwestern still a quality win for OSU?
Agreed. I think the rankings should take more into consideration. Using my point in my previous post. If USC had dropped out of the rankings and finished 7-6 because we were decimated by inury or if we had still had a solid season and finished in the top 10 -12, then maybe Stanford still gets credit for a quality win.
However, when it turns out that a team was clearly overrated, then it should no longer count as a quality win.