- Thread starter
- #1
assuming you have Trent..or you'd have come on here laughing about how you ripped some dude off.
Boggles my mind what some people will offer as a trade. I understand starting low, but things liek this are just f'n retarded
assuming you have Trent..or you'd have come on here laughing about how you ripped some dude off.
Boggles my mind what some people will offer as a trade. I understand starting low, but things liek this are just f'n retarded
Today I got offered Larry Fitzgerald for Trent Richardson
![]()
Hey TREFF, just made you an offer you can't refuse..................![]()
without looking...
we'll just see about that
but,, if it's Broyles for Richardson, I'm game
I'm assuming he isn't a bright fella?
Unless you drafted Harvin, Crabtree, Danario and Maclin as your WR corps.
Or another way to look at it is he is hoping MarkOU isn't a bright fella...........but we all know different. I'd still make a stupid counter back just to let him know how dumb that offer was.
Honestly, i dont think it as bad of a trade as all you making it out to be... Given i would never make the trade if i had richardson and would jump on it if i had fitz... But if i had great RB depth, and needed a WR, i might think about making an offer like this... But then again i am never afraid of overpaying for players i want...
So if you have great RB depth, then you have a second, maybe even a third RB that is more in line with Fitz's value, surely you'd offer one of those up before ever considering dealing your #1 though right?
It's a bad, darn near insulting, trade offer