• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Game Thread: 4.17 Underdog Hicks for the series win 1:05pm

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
140,856
61,092
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We could do this with all three of the aforementioned starters. Hicks and Verlander have also shown off some excellent stuff, even in the games where they’ve been hit around. Hicks was especially impressive Thursday after giving up five runs in the first inning. Another thing that stood out about the outing, though, is that he gave up five runs in the first inning.


Apropos of everything, let’s check out some other ERAs in the organization:

• Hayden Birdsong — 1.80 (MLB)
• Carson Seymour — 1.00 (Triple A)
• Carson Whisenhunt — 3.86 (Triple A)
• Mason Black — 3.00 (Triple A)

Hmm. It would appear that some of the Giants’ depth is thriving in different roles and locations. Also, it’s not 1988 and we’re not animals here, so let’s stop pretending that ERA is the only stat we need. Seymour has struck out 29.7 percent of the 74 batters he’s faced with Triple-A Sacramento, walking just five. Whisenhunt has 14 strikeouts and one walk in 14 innings. Black struck out 10 of the 19 batters he faced on Thursday night.

And you’re either screaming that I’m forgetting about Kyle Harrison, or you’re only now realizing you hadn’t thought about him yet. He was the presumptive fifth starter as of a few weeks ago, after all. While his 5.73 ERA for Sacramento isn’t sparkly, the reports of his velocity and stuff are encouraging. So is his nifty 16:4 K:BB ratio in 11 innings.

That’s five pitchers who aren’t in a major-league rotation, but probably could be. This is still omitting Keaton Winn (injury) and Carson Ragsdale (slow start). They might help this year, too.

If you’re wondering where this is all leading, let’s be very clear: It would take a silly, silly fool to give up on any of the three veterans right now. If you think any one of Ray, Verlander or Hicks is — or should be — on thin ice, you’ll need to put some money on Wilmer Flores getting MVP votes at the end of the year, because you clearly believe the first two weeks of April contain all the baseball information you’ll ever need. They take $100 out of my paycheck every time I write “it’s early” in an April article, but guess what? It’s early. So impossibly early. And all three veterans have already shown enough flashes this season to stick with them for a long time. This isn’t like when the Giants brought Russ Ortiz back to be the fifth starter in 2007, which blocked Tim Lincecum.


It’s all just a way to show off what a mess this has the potential to be. A happy, delightful mess. A confusing, enviable mess, and it’s impossible not to wonder just how the Giants will sort this out. Let’s say Whisenhunt makes another five starts, and they’re all excellent. Or Harrison’s ERA comes down and matches his peripherals over the next month. Or Birdsong continues to impress out of the bullpen, but it gets harder and harder to find him regular work. Or all of the above, plus another one, two or three of the other pitchers making their case.

Or just one of the above. Just one. That’s all it will take to get confusing.

It’s not just the veterans who deserve scrutiny, either. It’s everyone who isn’t Logan Webb, which means Landen Roupp will get evaluated in this strange context. His ERA is 4.80, but his FIP is 2.61, and his curveball looks like one of the best in the game. What happens if his ERA jumps to 5.80, but his FIP stays the same over the next month? What if they’re both closer to 4.00? What if he’s perfectly fine as the fifth starter, and nothing more, while others are dominating in lesser roles?

Buddy, I’m just throwing out questions because I lack the answers. And the questions extend beyond this season. Even assuming that attrition will separate some or most of these young pitchers, because that’s just how baseball works, there will be similar decisions to make this offseason. The Giants will have to figure out who to commit to, who they want to take for a test drive, who they’ll want in reserve, et cetera, before they look at free agents.

These are questions for the semi-near future, though. In the meantime, treat Ray, Verlander and Hicks as if they’re supremely talented veterans who’ve earned more than a little benefit of the doubt, which is exactly what they are, even if they all come with concerns. They get another month or two or three if they continue to have flashes of brilliance, even if there are messy innings around them. It’ll get noisy, but that’s the only reasonable path for a team trying to reach the postseason. The upside is with the youngsters in future seasons, but it’s with the veterans this season. They still have plenty of it.

With that out of the way, it’s time for some perspective. Check out this quote from Orioles GM Mike Elias from a couple of days ago:




That’s also a mess, but a very different kind. The Giants will have some decisions to make, but if this is a problem, it’s one that other teams would spend a lot of money to have. Some of them have spent a lot of money in the hopes of having the same problem. It didn’t work.

The decisions the Giants make or don’t make will be litigated in real time and for a long time after, especially if they’re the difference between making or missing the postseason. For now, just furrow your brow, and wait for it to sort itself out. It’s a good problem to have, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a confusing one.

(Top photo of Birdsong in a relief appearance: John Hefti / Imagn Images)
 

tzill

Lefty 99
27,380
8,226
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Interestingly, the Giants rotation has been the 4th-worst in baseball with a 4.68 ERA. They also have the 3rd-largest unfavorable variance compared to FIP (3.93) at 0.75. What does this mean? They probably have pitched a little better than their ERA would indicate.
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
140,856
61,092
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Interestingly, the Giants rotation has been the 4th-worst in baseball with a 4.68 ERA. They also have the 3rd-largest unfavorable variance compared to FIP (3.93) at 0.75. What does this mean? They probably have pitched a little better than their ERA would indicate.
Same thing Brisbee said above
 

Sandisfan

Well-Known Member
1,204
427
83
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Location
San Jose
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If most/all of these potentially starting pitchers can get hot statistically and in games there would be an excess so that begs the question would other teams come to the Giants and could the Giants convert that to help in other areas?
 

filosofy29

Back
12,587
1,832
173
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Interestingly, the Giants rotation has been the 4th-worst in baseball with a 4.68 ERA. They also have the 3rd-largest unfavorable variance compared to FIP (3.93) at 0.75. What does this mean? They probably have pitched a little better than their ERA would indicate.
I don’t know if stats show this (I really don’t), but does FIP take into account how comfortable a pitcher feels with the next hitter? When I used to pitch, if some dude was right on all my pitches, I’d walk them on purpose (but not IBB) - just throw out of the zone. Especially if i like throwing to the hitter on deck. Is that us pitching lucky? If pitching smart? Not to say this is every walk (ahem Ray)…just more a thought.
 
22,745
4,903
293
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Location
Two hours from anywhere one actually wants to be
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Off topic, but these schedules are wack. Why are games being played on the east coast in 35deg weather now? Padres have had 6 away games, ChiCubs being the furthest east, we've had 13 and are on the road for 3 more. Last year our Dodger series were over in June. Random couldn't be this weird

1) Agreed in part. This 10-game road trip was NYY-PHI and the Anaheim?!? Why not another east coast team for the third leg?

2) Really off target, but I remain puzzled about moving the High-A from the California League to the Northwest League. The weather is poor in the NW anyway (rain, anyone?), and in April-May it is worse. Games getting rained out. 7-inning double headers. I would think that there would be more value for High-A prospects to get some regular work in, not all the rainouts, etc.

3) Really, really off target: evidently this is the last year the Nuts will be in Modesto (unless some local almond grower ponies up the $35 million to get the stadium up to MLB specs). I plan to see a lot of Nuts games. Nothing quite like minor league baseball.
 

tzill

Lefty 99
27,380
8,226
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If most/all of these potentially starting pitchers can get hot statistically and in games there would be an excess so that begs the question would other teams come to the Giants and could the Giants convert that to help in other areas?
It wouldn't "beg" the question; it would "prompt" the question.

MAKE DICTION MATTER AGAIN!
 

tzill

Lefty 99
27,380
8,226
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I don’t know if stats show this (I really don’t), but does FIP take into account how comfortable a pitcher feels with the next hitter? When I used to pitch, if some dude was right on all my pitches, I’d walk them on purpose (but not IBB) - just throw out of the zone. Especially if i like throwing to the hitter on deck. Is that us pitching lucky? If pitching smart? Not to say this is every walk (ahem Ray)…just more a thought.
FIP is a sabermetric statistic that attempts to isolate a pitcher's effectiveness by focusing solely on the outcomes they have the most control over:
  • Home Runs (HR)
  • Strikeouts (K)
  • Unintentional Walks (BB)
  • Hit Batsmen (HBP)
FIP essentially tries to measure what a pitcher's ERA would look like if they experienced league-average results on balls put into play. It removes the influence of defense and luck on batted balls.
 

filosofy29

Back
12,587
1,832
173
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
FIP is a sabermetric statistic that attempts to isolate a pitcher's effectiveness by focusing solely on the outcomes they have the most control over:
  • Home Runs (HR)
  • Strikeouts (K)
  • Unintentional Walks (BB)
  • Hit Batsmen (HBP)
FIP essentially tries to measure what a pitcher's ERA would look like if they experienced league-average results on balls put into play. It removes the influence of defense and luck on batted balls.
Gotcha, ty. So it doesn’t measure a pitchers mind or preferences.

Like said someone like Ray who just can’t find the strike zone, I’d tend to trust this metric above. For someone like Logan who may want a different match up, I think the above metric can be very misleading.
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
65,907
19,481
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Does it even matter anymore. Literally doesn’t even mean what it used to mean. :(
Literally literally doesn’t mean literally.

My sig on here used to have a reference to the misuse of the word, then Websters had to officially break the language.
 

tzill

Lefty 99
27,380
8,226
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Literally literally doesn’t mean literally.

My sig on here used to have a reference to the misuse of the word, then Websters had to officially break the language.
Webster needs to get dafuq off my lawn.
 
Top