fightinfunbags
Well-Known Member
Then this is before his shooting motion and the foul is on the floor. There’s no way there’s 3.0 seconds left.It's not though. I had a post last night explaining it and you can go look it up. The hand on the back is at 3.1 to 3.0 seconds which might be the foul.
I’ve got it at 2.7/2.8 seconds. I watched the same video you did.But also when as Butler starts his upward motion where Horford's other hand is, that's also at the tail end of 3.0 seconds and 2.9 seconds if you go frame by frame on the Twitter post with the game feed.
They didn’t get this one right. I’ll “give it up” when you can post an accurate assessment of the way the play went down. I’m not rolling over for lies and bull shit. The timing decision and the decision to award 3 shots is wholly inconsistent. Additionally, there was another timing decision that took place in the Heat/Knicks series and that timing decision was made based on when the officials arm went up signaling the call.From the replay center feed, that latter one is appears to be the foul called (the one the report says it is as well) and they indicate that 3.0 seconds is on the game clock (on the basket) from that frame from those public videos and I'm sure the timestamps indicate this as well (which the public doesn't have). It's not hard to figure out knowing how they adjudicate replay that the timeframe stamps showed 3.0 seconds so that was the call. Just give it up. They got this one right.