- Thread starter
- #1
I didn't think it was funny when I posted it, still don't. But if you found humor in it happy you are pleased.Kinda funny a N.D. fan started this thread though.
I didn't think it was funny when I posted it, still don't. But if you found humor in it happy you are pleased.
I am neither all I did was present the facts. Why would I be upset?Are you upset that the Buckeyes beat the Fighting Irish? Maybe you're just an Ohio State hater. Not sure. But it doesn't matter. So far Ohio State's schedule has been Charmin soft.
Nahhh I am okay with them. They have a great history and have placed a lot of players in the NFL. I am cool with themNo reason really. Just asking a question. There are many that don't like Ohio State. Was just wondering if you were one of them.
The only tough game they have this year is the one at the end of the reg season…Been saying all season long Ohio Sate hasn't played anyone yet.
The only tough game they have this year is the one at the end of the reg season…
Typical
Nobody, to me the B10 always plays the weakest overall schedules. 2-3 teams at top, 11-12 that are bottom dwellers doormats in any other conferenceOutside of Penn State who has UofM played?
Colorado State (1-5), Hawaii (2-5), UConn (3-5), Maryland (5-2), Iowa (3-3), Indiana (3-4) and Penn State (5-1).
And don't get too excited about that Maryland win. Their W's are against bad teams.
Good deal. Gotta say though questioning their schedule is legit.
But you can say that about a lot of teams. Outside of this team, who has that team played. I'd bet at least half of the Top 25 ranked teams haven't played more than one good team. It's still too early in the season. And also what is considered a good team, if you discount Maryland because their wins were vs bad teams, that discounts a lot of teams. The list of teams who have beaten TWO good teams who also beat at least one good team, is pretty slim, and then we also get into the whole, why are they considered good, because they were ranked preseason? Then teams come along and beat them and it's a quality win whether they are actually good or not? I'm thinking specifically of the Pac getting credit for beating Baylor, BYU, Wisconsin & Michigan St when all 4 were ranked or maybe Wisconsin was just getting votes, but all 4 of those teams have shown themselves to have been way overrated. Do any of those 4 have a winning record even? So then another Pac team beats a conf opponent that is ranked high because they beat one of those 4 teams, and they get ranked high despite the fact the Pac team they beat may not have been all that good since the supposedly good team they beat ended up not being that good. I'm hoping the Selection Committee takes all of these kinds of things into consideration when they put out their rankings.Outside of Penn State who has UofM played?
Colorado State (1-5), Hawaii (2-5), UConn (3-5), Maryland (5-2), Iowa (3-3), Indiana (3-4) and Penn State (5-1).
And don't get too excited about that Maryland win. Their W's are against bad teams.
Nobody, to me the B10 always plays the weakest overall schedules. 2-3 teams at top, 11-12 that are bottom dwellers doormats in any other conference
They scheduled a team coming off a recent playoff appearance. And Toledo could possibly win the MAC. It's better than most.