- Thread starter
- #1
San Antonio probably would already have them but no way in hell Jerrah would allow that
Well no way it is in Seattle or Portland.
Why not Mexico City? The NFL wants that dump so let them play there until the Vegas stadium is ready.
That'd be quite the ego-hit it seems like... but logical.Rumblings that they'll play at Levis.
Also, I read that they will be called the "Oakland Raiders" only for so long as they're playing in the bay area. If they don't wind-up at Levis - does this mean they'd have to take on a one year name being the "San Antonio Raiders" then?
Don't see why they would be forced....the Saints were still New Orleans in 2005 when they played in San Antonio and NY.
They played at LSU mostly, no?
Those circumstances were also very different from this. Raiders are leaving and it is for good.
Santa Clara makes the most sense, followed by Pasadina. At least this keeps them close to the fan base.Rumblings that they'll play at Levis.
Santa Clara makes the most sense, followed by Pasadina. At least this keeps them close to the fan base.
I read about Sam Boyd Stadium in Nevada. That would also make sense.