PAC 12 Thread v6.0

[TheRobotDevil]

He's just being his typical derp, just like he's stuck on some bad troll attempt of saying at some point I said USC was entirely mathematically eliminated because I said their game with Oregon State had no CCG implications at a time they were a game back. You, and I, and any sane person understands that meant no game had an impact on the South with Utah fully a game up on everyone UNLESS Utah lost a game. Dipshit can't wrap his mind around that.

I gave you the numbers veering off topic using words like “derp” “troll” just confirms my facts. It would be the equivalent of saying you’re “triggered” Staying on topic and discussing the facts and college football. The facts state the Zona game had a much bigger effect on Oregon’s odds. Their odds took a much bigger hit when they lost to Xoba. Otherwise Oregon and Udubs are 2 loss teams. With Oregon holding the tie break down the stretch. Unless you can refute Oregon holding the tie breaker ovef Washington there is no debate......

 

[TheDayMan]

I'll break it down like I did for Wiz when he claimed the games last week had no impact on the PAC CCG

After the Wazzu loss Oregon only had 2 conference losses.The Ducks were 11 game behind Washington and they held the tie breaker.

Wazzu had 1conference loss and 5 conference games left Stanford,Cal,Colorado Arizona and Washington

Washington had 1 conference loss with 4 conference games remaining
Cal,Stanford,Oregon State and Wazzu

Oregon had 2 conference losses with 5 conference games left
Zona,UCLA,Utah,ASU and Oregoin State

If Wazzu stumbled Oregon had the tie breaker over Washington.

Washingtons loss to Cal puts them at 2 conference losses

If not for the Arizona loss Oregon would have jumped Washington in the standings. Since they have the head to head win. The Arizona loss put Oregon behind the 8 ball. The Utah loss has all but eliminated them.

Sometimes Wiz gets a bit distracted by Oregon etc...and his numbers and data are a bit off. Ie thinking the Oregon and SC games had no implications on the PAC CCG last week. Or that Wazzu eliminated Oregin when they were factually still very much alive. The Zona loss was the loss that actually Hit the ducks odds the hardest. Otherwise Oregoni is a 2 loss team thats in second in the north...

Then again he thought SC was out of the south leave last week .....

Good luck I'm hoping to see the Cougs run the table. The PAC needs a Mike Leach involved in the flawed play off system

2nd half is starting

Fight On \/

Why would anyone give a shit what the score was 3 weeks ago? This all started because you tried to argue oregon would still have a chance if they won today, which they clearly wouldn't. Goddamn clarkson, you should have just stopped trying to type hours ago.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

I get your point but you are speaking of percentages not reality. The point you are making is UW and Oregon finishing with two loses a piece correct? If that were the case UW has the tie breaker over them because they beat us and the 4th place team in Stanford. Oregon’s only road was for us to lose to Colorado, Arizona and the Mutts. UW’s matchups were really irrelevant in Oregon’s season after they lost to us.

Yes it’s based on percentages. But one can not claim games have no implications on the PAC CCG. When by fact they do. More interested in the SC game. Helton got this team falling apart always good when your teams fighting on the sidelines

 

[TheDayMan]

Washington list to Cal. If Oregon beat Zona Oregon and Washington have the same amount of kisses. The head to head win over Washington puts Oregon over Washington. Which is why the Zona game was the back breaker for Oregon.Claiming any PAC south game had no CCG implicatio
I can pull the numbers and tie breakers after the game.

Thank you for clarifying, or trying to in some kind of clarkson speak, anyway, what could have happened two weeks ago.

Jesus christ...

 

[WizardHawk]

I have, and I’ve told you fother muckers since USC beat you two years ago Browning would be an issue for you. He is a right handed Kellen Moore. A great QB for a school like us but not for a playoff caliber school.

They have more issues than Browning. It all lies at the feet of the coaches. I had real concerns going into the year with a first year play caller with no prior game calling experience at any level and it's been an unmitigated disaster.

 

[WizardHawk]

Why would anyone give a shit what the score was 3 weeks ago? This all started because you tried to argue oregon would still have a chance if they won today, which they clearly wouldn't. Goddamn clarkson, you should have just stopped trying to type hours ago.

I mean this is his M.O. Every time he's called out and out of ammo he turns to spinning up some bullshit on an entirely different tangent. Wazzy brought up the prior week, not us and yet he's turned to latching onto that as if it proves something about this week. It's what he does. 100% of the time.

I asked him to show where the path was for the ducks AFTER WSU's win THIS FUCKING WEEK and before the ducks loss today. He can't, and won't. And sneak peek, IF he tries I'll expose his lack of understanding of the multi team tiebreaker rules just like I did in this exact same scenario a couple of years back.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Well firing Calloway was a small step.

Helton's play calling isn't an upgrade from Tee which isn't a good thing.

He continues to play Lobendahn at Center who cant snap the ball. Cost them a safety and momentum again. The only game they didnt have problems with snaps was in at C.

Team mates fighting on the sidelines.

SC most likely doesn't make bowl eligibility

This games over.....I cant even blame windows 95. Helton's got to go. SC needs an actual coach. That can actually get production out of their talent

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Thank you for clarifying, or trying to in some kind of clarkson speak, anyway, what could have happened two weeks ago.

Jesus christ...

You're welcome

 

[TheRobotDevil]

I mean this is his M.O. Every time he's called out and out of ammo he turns to spinning up some bullshit on an entirely different tangent. Wazzy brought up the prior week, not us and yet he's turned to latching onto that as if it proves something about this week. It's what he does. 100% of the time.

I asked him to show where the path was for the ducks AFTER WSU's win THIS FUCKING WEEK and before the ducks loss today. He can't, and won't. And sneak peek, IF he tries I'll expose his lack of understanding of the multi team tiebreaker rules just like I did in this exact same scenario a couple of years back.

Not sure where I factor into the PAC 12 standings or PAC 12 tie breakers. But my MO is if its not college football related......Tis the college football board.....

Back on topic I already provided the facts. If Oregon doesn't lose to Arizona they jump Udubs. The Zona game was after the Wazzu game....The Ducks are still very much in the North. Just as the games you mentioned all had CCG implications.

Tbh I'm much more interested in the SC coaching situation. Helton's seat just got red hot imo

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Thats not a catch WR was out of bounds

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Good Game @Berkeley_Blues2.0

 

[WizardHawk]

Not sure where I factor into the PAC 12 standings or PAC 12 tie breakers. But my MO is if its not college football related......

Back on topic I already provided the facts. If Oregon doesn't lose to Arizona they jump Udubs. The Zona game was after the Wazzu game....The Ducks are still very much in the North. Just as the games you mentioned all had CCG implications.

Tbh I'm much more interested in the SC coaching situation. Helton's seat just got red hot imo

Bingo. He finally admits I'm right.

Show me where I said a single word about anything from last week retard. I didn't.

You went on a tangent across 3 threads now accusing me of saying the south race was completely over because you aren't smart enough to get what literally everyone else does and incorrectly said WSU TODAY didn't complete the elimination of Oregon, Utah's win did. You will either show your work on that, or you won't. No one cares about last week, or the week before, nor anything prior. The discussion was 100% on this weeks game and your statement was clear, and clearly wrong.

Zero chance you won't go back off topic though. It literally is all you have left.

Can't even stay on your game you are so derped out over this.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Bingo. He finally admits I'm right.

Show me where I said a single word about anything from last week retard. I didn't.

You went on a tangent across 3 threads now accusing me of saying the south race was completely over because you aren't smart enough to get what literally everyone else does and incorrectly said WSU TODAY didn't complete the elimination of Oregon, Utah's win did. You will either show your work on that, or you won't. No one cares about last week, or the week before, nor anything prior. The discussion was 100% on this weeks game and your statement was clear, and clearly wrong.

Zero chance you won't go back off topic though. It literally is all you have left.

Can't even stay on your game you are so derped out over this.

I quoted you saying there were no games with PAC CCG implications last week......SC is out after this loss. But Utah,ASU and Zona are all still in.I think Utah may have the edge Zona ASU is a rough match up for ASU

 

[WizardHawk]

I quoted you saying there were no games with PAC CCG implications last week......SC is out after this loss. But Utah,ASU and Zona are all still in.I think Utah may have the edge Zona ASU is a rough match up for ASU

Again, wasn't the topic because you CAN'T prove the actual topic, so more distractions.

There isn't a person on this site who would look at what I actually said and believe it meant I thought USC was mathematically eliminated weeks ago.

It was correct that NO game other than Utah's had an impact AT THAT TIME because they were a game up on everyone. It wasn't a race again until they lost. It's entirely obvious and elementary. But you WON'T let go of it, even while your own team is actually playing, because you cannot face what this actually started out being.

Prove the ducks had a path to the North title after WSU won today before Oregon finished their loss. That's it. Just do THAT. This was the only discussion until you went full bat shit crazy.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Again, wasn't the topic because you CAN'T prove the actual topic, so more distractions.

There isn't a person on this site who would look at what I actually said and believe it meant I thought USC was mathematically eliminated weeks ago.

It was correct that NO game other than Utah's had an impact AT THAT TIME because they were a game up on everyone. It wasn't a race again until they lost. It's entirely obvious and elementary. But you WON'T let go of it, even while your own team is actually playing, because you cannot face what this actually started out being.

Prove the ducks had a path to the North title after WSU won today before Oregon finished their loss. That's it. Just do THAT. This was the only discussion until you went full bat shit crazy.

Nt sure why you would think SC was mathematically eliminated weeks ago. The South standings have been knotted up all year.....

 

[WizardHawk]

Nt sure why you would think SC was mathematically eliminated weeks ago. The South standings have been knotted up all year.....

Well, because I didn't think they were dipshit.

Once again... Back up your words or keep with tangents meant to distract from them.

 

[RegentDenali]

Remember when USC fans were claiming that Justin Wilcox was a total joke as a defensive coordinator and scapegoated for all their problems. Even after they went 9-4 and won the holiday bowl.

We'll tonight that joke's defense beat them.

Cal is now bowl eligible.
USC is out of the PAC south running and still not bowl eligible.

 

[WizardHawk]

And the roller coaster ride in the Pac continues.

If Cal ever finds an offense look out.

Does this game mark the point where Cal passes or at least equals Oregon this year? Cal has 3 road wins even. Yikes. Yes, the ducks beat them earlier, but they are two teams going in opposite directions since then. Can't wait to see Stanford at Cal next week. Can they hold Stanford's offense down like this?

 

[wazzu31]

Yes it’s based on percentages. But one can not claim games have no implications on the PAC CCG. When by fact they do. More interested in the SC game. Helton got this team falling apart always good when your teams fighting on the sidelines

Because percentages aren’t really what it is about since they lose to the first place team. It switched to an equation since we are going all Stanford up in this bitch. We are A. Oregon is B. UW is C. And the Trees are D with the Pac 12 North title as E. A + X =E Well B, C and D are useless if A doesn’t lose so from the start B has no chance of = E if A doesn’t fall into the negative. I think I did my math otherwise fudge it I didn’t major in anything useful in society.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Because percentages aren’t really what it is about since they lose to the first place team. It switched to an equation since we are going all Stanford up in this bitch. We are A. Oregon is B. UW is C. And the Trees are D with the Pac 12 North title as E. A + X =E Well B, C and D are useless if A doesn’t lose so from the start B has no chance of = E if A doesn’t fall into the negative. I think I did my math otherwise fudge it I didn’t major in anything useful in society.

I was never saying it was probable. At the time Wiz claimed oregon was eliminated they were mathematically still alive

Oregon had 3 conference losses with 3 conference games remaining

Washington State had 1 conference loss with 4 conference games remaining

Washington had 2 conference losses with 3 conference games remaining

If Oregon won out,Washington lost 1 game and Wazzu lost 3 of their last 4 including Washington.

Oregon 6-3
Washington 6-3
Wazzu 6-4

And Oregon has the head to head tie breaker

Would have been a long shot but we couldn't say the Oregon UCLA games or the SC ASU games had no implications in the PAC CCG.