- Thread starter
- #11,041
@Barilko sent a offer.
responded on Fantrax@Barilko sent a offer.
If you have a RB to spare for a bench WR, you should give me a jingle. I'm really skinny at RB depth.I even said it on the offer that it’s a long shot but it meets their criteria lol
Stay off my lawn!If you have a RB to spare for a bench WR, you should give me a jingle. I'm really skinny at RB depth.
You like any of my bench WRs?I would be willing to move Monty in the right deal
Sorry had to cross over to get to where I wanted to be.Stay off my lawn!
No rush on this deal. As far as ever using a player, not sure I’d be pleased using TyMo in my line up either, but depth is always good to have.@HaroldSeattle
I see your offer. I just don’t know when I would play him. Let me hear from the other offer I have and I’ll be able to make a decision. I have AROB in a pending deal
anyone want alf
its a rb, who plays......im sure more valuable then some rosteredMaybe if he was on the WW.
Yup he's better then some on my bench RBs at the moment and if he's on the WW I'd be tempted to put in a claim.its a rb, who plays......im sure more valuable then some rostered
worth a tryYup he's better then some on my bench RBs at the moment and if he's on the WW I'd be tempted to put in a claim.
I agree to an extent. Give me RB depth over WR depth most times which is where my hesitance comes fromNo rush on this deal. As far as ever using a player, not sure I’d be pleased using TyMo in my line up either, but depth is always good to have.
Yes RB depth>WR depth, but it seems like you were considering doing just that ( trading a RB for WR). I assume you feel Jones is the Packer RB to own and TyMo likely just gets token chances to deliver. I could be wrong in my interpretation of your posts.I agree to an extent. Give me RB depth over WR depth most times which is where my hesitance comes from