- Thread starter
- #1
Stokes1931
Fan
- 22,667
- 4,810
- 293
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
Not liking what I'm reading about the reasons why. Neukom was running the team how a business should be run, investing in capital. And it appears that certain influential owners (probably the Burns kids) are thinking of the team's finances like one might a household budget.
GP, I'm not saying that you're wrong, but we don't have the evidence to support that yet. We do know that the ownership group didn't appreciate not being in the loop regarding spending. We can also reasonably infer that there were personality conflicts. More than that, we can't say.
I'm hoping this thread doesn't degenerate into "Newkom wanted to raise payroll and the ownership group is greedy and cheap."
Not that this is what you are saying, but let's wait for the information to come out.
Well, his "wait and see approach" coupled with what seems like an inclusion of individuals that may or may not be in the best interest of business decisions could rub investors the wrong way. Even then, so what if they got a little butthurt? If it's strictly from a business / profit perspective, then the reasons given from "the source" already suck. Because at best, he brought a world series victory, and at worst, they miss the playoffs while making more money than ever. So, why the dump? It's just all weird.
Decent read on Neukom
From today's Chron:
The Chronicle learned that the major partners were not upset over how Neukom spent the money, but rather that he did so without their consent. They learned of some major decisions by reading the newspaper.
Recent meetings of the executive committee, of which Neukom is a member, were said to be contentious over that issue.
My take: Neukom forced out by the Burns kids.
I am 100% ignorant, but this scares me.
The last time a local championship team was taken over by the children of the owners, it did not turn out to well. The Spanks have not won the WS since the kiddo's took over, either...