- Thread starter
- #1,061
Tommy Likey! How about there's no set way you have to draft, you can select a 1890's player with your first pick then second pick you can select someone who played for the Cubs then someone from the 1940's and so on?
Also, once you pick a player whatever you use him for you can't change him, EX... You draft Mike Schmidt for the 1970's later you wanna switch him to the player for the Phillies, NEIN! You cannot!
This one might be a lot of work for me...![]()
Didn't we just do a you get two teams baseball draft?
NEIN! There has to be some kind of restriction!
So, now i'm kinda not wanting to do a two team draft, we literally just did this draft but with less rules...
Perfect. The Mother of all baseball Mocks.Tommy Likey! How about there's no set way you have to draft, you can select a 1890's player with your first pick then second pick you can select someone who played for the Cubs then someone from the 1940's and so on?
Also, once you pick a player whatever you use him for you can't change him, EX... You draft Mike Schmidt for the 1970's later you wanna switch him to the player for the Phillies, NEIN! You cannot!
Only if you use Milks pecker as a toothbrush...Let's just skip baseball and move on to the NBA...
![]()
I would say it doesn't matter but now that we may scrap the AL/NL thing, I guess it does matter. Let's get that figured out then we'll come back to this.So, do we make it that if you pick a player for team 1 with your first pick the next pick has to be for team two?
I would say it doesn't matter but now that we may scrap the AL/NL thing, I guess it does matter. Let's get that figured out then we'll come back to this.
I was thinking about this as well.I say we dont do AL/NL and do think we alternate picks between our teams otherwise someone might just say fuck my second team i'll make my first team as good as I can and hope I win this...
Really shocked at Houston being up 10 at halftime. I see Warriors coming out strong and winning by 7 to force a game 7.