yeah , i am THAT poster

[skinsdad62]

Washington Redskins could be surprise suitors for Jeremy Maclin

what about mackilin ? would you ? i tend to say not at this time , but i would kick the tires

 

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

yes not very productive last year he is good

 

[gkekoa]

No. He will still cost, and what role will he play, third outside WR? Then what happens to Harris and Davis? Are we already saying Quick is gone? I think it would be foolish.

 

[ehb5]

No. He will still cost, and what role will he play, third outside WR? Then what happens to Harris and Davis? Are we already saying Quick is gone? I think it would be foolish.

That's my biggest problem. We don't really need him but he'd end up taking time away from doctson, Harris, and Davis. Unless we feel like giving up on them id pass.

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

My first reaction was why? He will be expensive and they have bigger needs. But they have a giant question mark at WR2 as Doc is completely unproven and nobody is confusing Quick with Pierre Garcon. Depends on the deal.

 

[gkekoa]

My first reaction was why? He will be expensive and they have bigger needs. But they have a giant question mark at WR2 as Doc is completely unproven and nobody is confusing Quick with Pierre Garcon. Depends on the deal.

We do have a question at #2 but what makes anybody believe Marlin is the answer? He obviously wasn't the answer for the coach that he made his name with in the offense he was successful.

If we sign him, it means Harris, Davis, or another young WR doesn't get a fair shake.

 

[skinsdad62]

We do have a question at #2 but what makes anybody believe Marlin is the answer? He obviously wasn't the answer for the coach that he made his name with in the offense he was successful.

If we sign him, it means Harris, Davis, or another young WR doesn't get a fair shake.

he got cut because of the cap but to me you only pick him up if we have injuries .

 

[Hambombs]

Kick the tires!!!

 

[Caliskinsfan]

Nah

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

If we sign him, it means Harris, Davis, or another young WR doesn't get a fair shake.

This is a very good point, I'm back to "why?" on this one.

 

[gkekoa]

This is a very good point, I'm back to "why?" on this one.

Because money speaks, as does draft position. If you pay Maclin, he will play and likely cost a younger, cheaper, and potentially better player a roster spot.

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

Because money speaks, as does draft position. If you pay Maclin, he will play and likely cost a younger, cheaper, and potentially better player a roster spot.

No I was agreeing with you, I meant why sign him?