- Thread starter
- #21
Brees#1
Well-Known Member
exactly
They have a different OC this year and while it was 65%, the roles were clear. Freeman had a lot of big runs last year and Coleman was a third down back.
exactly
still not 75They have a different OC this year and while it was 65%, the roles were clear. Freeman had a lot of big runs last year and Coleman was a third down back.
There was no need to negotiate with Coleman, he wasnt going into a contact year. The fact they extended Freeman and not Coleman is pretty irrelevant. And if they wish to keep that machine purring, they'll still be splitting touches regardless of who's getting the big bucksI thought the negotiations went rather well, no threats from either side. I don't think the Falcons have had any negotiations with Coleman, least not that I have heard. Pretty clear who the Falcons consider important, Freeman and he'll dominate the touches.
i hate when u bring logicThere was no need to negotiate with Coleman, he wasnt going into a contact year. The fact they extended Freeman and not Coleman is pretty irrelevant. And if they wish to keep that machine purring, they'll still be splitting touches regardless of who's getting the big bucks
They have a different OC this year and while it was 65%, the roles were clear. Freeman had a lot of big runs last year and Coleman was a third down back.
I know right? Shit gets me ignored sometimes, but so be iti hate when u bring logic