mcnabb7542
Resident Fake Asian!
Trading up to take a WR!
Need OLB, Corners, and a safety, those three trump a wide out in the first round...
Need OLB, Corners, and a safety, those three trump a wide out in the first round...
Sharkonabicycle;4893784[B said:]Seattle drafting this Joel Bitonio[/B] guy that a ton of people have Seattle mocked to take.
I'm tired of getting these O-Lineman that are 'versatile'. Why don't we just get a guard or tackle that is GOOD at the one position. When in the Sam hell are you going to shift a guy all over the line if he's playing well at his position? Seems stupid. James Carpenter COULD play tackle, but he sucked at it. He sucked at pass protection as guard as well but at least he was a mauler in the run game.
Besides, I don't like any of the O-Lineman towards the end of round 1/early round 2. Pass rusher/LB or bust there. Wouldn't even mind another CB there.
Saints: Trade down (unless they get a really good deal). I don't want them to risk missing out on a quality player in order to add more picks. They have limited cap room and roster space, anyway.
Packers: Draft a WR. I wouldn't mind one later on, but they have much more pressing needs in the secondary and at LB.
How about you guys?
Falcons: Trade down or draft a WR. Neither of which needs to be done.
Agreed with the bold. I wouldn't mind trading down depending on the deal and our position from that point going forward.
Draft a LB at 17 or trade back and miss a starting caliber player at a position of need like Dix at safety or one of the top OT's......
I mean if we trade down and lose out on one of Mack/Barr/Robinson/Matthews, though, highly unlikely. One of them will be there at 6.
I mean if we trade down and lose out on one of Mack/Barr/Robinson/Matthews, though, highly unlikely. One of them will be there at 6.