What could your team do in round 1 that would totally piss you off?

[fearthepelicans]

Saints: Trade down (unless they get a really good deal). I don't want them to risk missing out on a quality player in order to add more picks. They have limited cap room and roster space, anyway.

Packers: Draft a WR. I wouldn't mind one later on, but they have much more pressing needs in the secondary and at LB.

How about you guys?

 

[FaCe-LeE-uS]

1)Trade up in the 1st... Wouldn't be ideal when we don't have the picks to deal. Can't trade compensatory picks, so trading up should be out of the question IMO. Trading back would be the only possibility.

2) Drafting a QB in the 1st


Another could be if they passed up on a top 10 talent that dropped. But that's debatable when there are too many positions that PIT could go for. I have to just trust whomever Colbert decides to roll with.

 

[Tharvot]

Browns:

Draft Johnny Fooseball with the #4 overall pick. Riskiest pick in the draft and absolutely not worth the risk if a player like Watkins, Mack, Matthews, or Barr is available. I will throw a fit.

 

[cdumler7]

For the broncos it would be taking a quarterback or running back. There have been rumors of Elway leaning quarterback but there is just too much talent to waste a pick on a guy that is going to sit on the bench for probably 2 years

 

[Clayton]

Manziel to the Rams rumors are a bit worrysome at 2

 

[packerzrule]

Packers taking a QB in the first round

 

[Thruthefog]

Lions trading up for any fucking body.

 

[poprocksncoke]

Manziel or Bridgewater

 

[FaCe-LeE-uS]

Pretty sure the majority are going to say "Drafting Manziel"

 

[TENN.SPORTS.FAN]

Draft Johnny Football.

 

[TENN.SPORTS.FAN]

Pretty sure the majority are going to say "Drafting Manziel"

Good call

 

[WhiteMamba]

Manziel or Bridgewater

No on Teddy please and thank you.

Thinking Khalil Mack will be picked like it or not.

 

[Clayton]

Pretty sure the majority are going to say "Drafting Manziel"

I think that would be a great idea in Rd2

 

[packfancjh]

The Pack drafting a WR, QB or TE in 1. I want to see ILB, S or DT depending on who is left at 21

 

[ATL96Steeler]

How about you guys?

Well, I'm looking for the #1 guy to contribute if not start.

CB...I wouldn't be pissed b/c PIT needs a CB, I'm not seeing a huge gap from the top guys to the guys that are available later in the draft...aside from injury, I don't see any CB in this draft contributing much this yr on DEF in PIT.


NT...I would be pissed if they took Nix @ 15...#1, this position is not on the field enough to justify taking a NT here unless the guy is a no questions stud, and he's not that guy imo...not after watching mid 1st round picks on Bama's OL dominate ND in the NC game.

By the same token, if they dropped back into the 20s and got Nix...I can tolerate it more, but still wouldn't don't like it because there are other lessor know guys that can do what he brings.

 

[Broncosr0k]

Pulling a Ravens/Vikings and skipping the pick would piss me off.

 

[Nasty_Magician]

Really do not want to see the Cowboys take any skill position on offense. I can live with an offensive lineman but please no wideouts as has been rumored.

 

[Davis_Mike]

Here is my list:

-Drafting Manziel or Bridgewater in the 1st round.
-Trading out of the 1st round unless it was for a MASSIVE haul.
-Trading up to near the number 10 spot. Why do this when it is a deep draft? So now you have only a few draft picks & at that spot you have already missed out on the elite talent.
-Drafting a WR.
-Passing on Barr/Pryor/Dix for a T or ILB or a QB not named Bortles.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Pulling a Ravens/Vikings and skipping the pick would piss me off.

That about covers it for me also. The FO has done enough good things that I've got faith in them, not to say that they haven't struck out from time to time, but they have more then made up for those strike outs by hitting one over the fence in every draft.

 

[Johnnydollaz89]

Falcons: Trade down or draft a WR. Neither of which needs to be done.