- Thread starter
- #41
Johnnydollaz89
Well-Known Member
I think I have, like 3 of em' unopened.
I remember waiting in line to get em'.
That's pretty good. Could be worth anywhere from $90-$350
I think I have, like 3 of em' unopened.
I remember waiting in line to get em'.
That's pretty good. Could be worth anywhere from $90-$350
Anybody reading DC Rebirth issues?
You don't like the Scott Snyder run?No. They seem stupid.
Especially Superman.
They just spend 4 years on new 52 only to light it up with a nuke?
F*ck DC.
Superman married with a kid is LAME.
I can't even keep track of Batman anymore.
Superman/WW ROCKED.
Why are they doing this? What was the point of the last few years then?
lol. Kind of like me watching The Sopranos after the second seasonI say all that and yet I KNOW, for a FACT, that I'm going to buy every trade paperback that comes out with that "S" on it.
You don't like the Scott Snyder run?
Batman's New 52 was awesome.
He is, and the first seven editions are fucking awesome. Volumes 1 and 2 are two of my favorite collected editions of all time.Without too many spoilers...is Bruce Wayne even Batman anymore? I mean Batman seemed to really jump the shark recently.
I'm just curious if it's worthwhile since I haven't followed anything Batman since about mid 2000s.
He is, and the first seven editions are fucking awesome. Volumes 1 and 2 are two of my favorite collected editions of all time.
No, I was referring to this
View attachment 130116
OHHHH.
New 52 Batman!!
I've heard good things.
Yeah Rebirth is probably going to do some major damage to that.
Since they literally killed off new 52 superman, basically saying he was an artificial creation by some creepy weird dude.
It was an awesome read! Very much worth it, and so far, Batman and Green Arrow Rebirth, have been pretty good.
How many people are excited for an FX adaptation of Y: The Last Man! Overall, my favorite graphic novel series, albeit it was short (but in some cases that isn't a bad thing because they don't have time to run it on and jump the shark).
View attachment 130198