- Thread starter
- #1
Mike A. S.
Well-Known Member
Do you like the rule of every team getting at least one player in the All-Star game? Or do you think it's unfair and should be eliminated?
You should not be an all star just because your team needs 1 representative because in my book, you're not really an all star
Do you like the rule of every team getting at least one player in the All-Star game? Or do you think it's unfair and should be eliminated?
FIFYMichael Brantley was a horrible selection. No way in hell has be been better than Benintendi/Hicks/Rosario/Stanton. Salvador Perez is questionable even with how bad AL catchers have been, the dude's running a 72 OPS+. I don't care how good your defense is if you're hitting that poorly (even by catcher standards).
Segura and Snell are also glaring omissions.
Jesus Aguilar is also a glaring omission. Hopefully that gets fixed. Tied for 1st, 3rd, and 9th in Triple Crown stats.
I agree with this.Michael Brantley was a horrible selection. No way in hell has be been better than Benintendi/Hicks/Rosario/Stanton. Salvador Perez is questionable even with how bad AL catchers have been, the dude's running a 72 OPS+. I don't care how good your defense is if you're hitting that poorly (even by catcher standards).
Simmons and Snell are also glaring omissions.
Children are a big reason why every team has a player.LMFAO fucking embarrassing.
You would think these guys are children that every team must be rewarded with an AS.
Yes
It's an exhibition and a showcase. There would be less interest without all teams represented.
And pitchers should never hit.
Okayyyyyy...You're wrong
Michael Brantley was a horrible selection. No way in hell has be been better than Benintendi/Hicks/Rosario/Stanton. Salvador Perez is questionable even with how bad AL catchers have been, the dude's running a 72 OPS+. I don't care how good your defense is if you're hitting that poorly (even by catcher standards).
Simmons and Snell are also glaring omissions.