Sportster 72
Well-Known Member
Like Diron Talbert in the old days I rarely root for an ex-Cowboy. If Sean Lee became available I would root for him since he played at Penn State.
Like Diron Talbert in the old days I rarely root for an ex-Cowboy. If Sean Lee became available I would root for him since he played at Penn State.
He was definitely good, and if you watched the Skins/Boys games, you know that. But at 31 - coming off his worst season and being injury-prone... this isn't the kind of signing I'm happy with. If the Skins keep signing injury-prone players, they better not whine if they get injured.
More than likelyI think the Skins draft a corner at some point.
Thrift shop operation still in tact
Well, It’s better than overpaying scrubs like alot of teams are doing... No?
our HC gruden says we need 6 cbs , we have 5 . scandrick isnt a camp body . he will play a rolewell if a rookie beats out scandrick or a another player that said player has to be good but this signing is meh to me but money wise its great and should not be mad at this move .. And NO this is not a move that bruce said we need a starting cb lets get scandrick look at contract its borderline just a camp body or competiton
our HC gruden says we need 6 cbs , we have 5 . scandrick isnt a camp body . he will play a role
Ok. So what are you proposing? We have six $5 mill+ APY CBs on our roster?
I don’t mean to sound like a complete smartass, but I’m not sure where you are going with this. We can’t fill and pay the roster with stud starters and backups. You know this. The Scandrick deal is low $$$ low risk. It’s a good deal for a benchwarmer who might be needed here and there.
We didn’t want Long and he really wasn’t all that special. He has injury problems and Roullier played well at Long’s natural position. Spencer was not a vital piece in helping this team win a SB.
Ok. So what are you proposing? We have six $5 mill+ APY CBs on our roster?
I don’t mean to sound like a complete smartass, but I’m not sure where you are going with this. We can’t fill and pay the roster with stud starters and backups. You know this. The Scandrick deal is low $$$ low risk. It’s a good deal for a benchwarmer who might be needed here and there. There is practically nothing guaranteed in his deal.
We didn’t want Long and he really wasn’t all that special. He has injury problems and Roullier played well at Long’s natural position. Spencer was not a vital piece in helping this team win a SB.
too bad you cant read a contractcmon vt Long and TM were studs and we had to sign them back at overpaid deals. lol
I think we'll end up needing at least 5 CB's for significant PT. Most teams have a base 3 WR set, so ya basically need 3 starting CB's, and they'll all need some rest, and ya gotta figure on a couple of injuries. But yes, the Skins were smart in limiting their risk on the Scandrick deal.Ok. So what are you proposing? We have six $5 mill+ APY CBs on our roster?
I don’t mean to sound like a complete smartass, but I’m not sure where you are going with this. We can’t fill and pay the roster with stud starters and backups. You know this. The Scandrick deal is low $$$ low risk. It’s a good deal for a benchwarmer who might be needed here and there. There is practically nothing guaranteed in his deal.
We didn’t want Long and he really wasn’t all that special. He has injury problems and Roullier played well at Long’s natural position. Spencer was not a vital piece in helping this team win a SB.
too bad you cant read a contract