wiskyisgood12
Member
IMO...if the NCAA want's to promote them as student athletes. It's tough to graduate in 4 years, with all the extra classes that you are required to take that have nothing to do with the degree. It is not uncommon now days that students go to graduate in 5 years, rather than 4.
So from an academic angle, I can agree.
Completely agree with this. It's easy for an undergrad degree to take 5 and in some cases 6 years. It makes sense academically.
I don't now if it makes sense athletically, if you eliminate the redshirt year and allow them to play for 5 years would many people stay the extra year? Why not leave after the traditional 4 years of athletic eligibility? It can create program depth, but if I'm in my 5th year and I've for the most part played sparingly why would I stay on the team the last year to continue not playing. I could move on with my life or strictly focus on finishing up my degree. Again, it makes perfect sense on the academic side, but not sure why football coaches would agree.