Manster7588
I Support Law Enforcement.
Well now this does change the odd of Barkley falling to 4, if he's on Cleveland's must have list. It also removes the 2nd best QB if Cleveland thought they could get him at 4.
it's an opinion ass holeSure they are sport. Sure they are.
Are you in their draft meetings to know this is absolutely, for sure, stone cold lock, they're doing this?
who I root for....LOLBarkley at one is even more laughable. Yet you're here banging that drum. I'd ask why but I see who you root for and already know the answer.
Well if it makes you feel any better, I think taking Barkley at #1 is the Brownsiest Browns thing the Browns could do. I also think Rosen is ripe for more concussions, so if that's who the Jets want at 3, I say have at it Jets.
Well now this does change the odd of Barkley falling to 4, if he's on Cleveland's must have list. It also removes the 2nd best QB if Cleveland thought they could get him at 4.
Yup, think it all comes down to if the Browns love one QB...Cause now they would have to take him at 1
Definitely this. This was a preemptive move by the Jets against the Bills. This ensures the Jets get their choice of 2 of the top 4 QBs.Biggest loser is probably the Bills. Their main competition to trade up for Rosen is now picking ahead of them, and the Giants could just take a QB if they don't sell the farm to them.
If they only loved one, they'd of had to taken him before this trade, now if they love two they gotta take one at 1. If they pass you have Giants and Jets needing QB's leaving the Browns with possibly their 3rd QB choice.Yup, think it all comes down to if the Browns love one QB...Cause now they would have to take him at 1
One other possibility is there is already a deal in place, which is why the Jets are so confident so as to trade to #3. Without knowing that as a fact, I'd be sweating bullets if I were a Bills fan.Definitely this. This was a preemptive move by the Jets against the Bills. This ensures the Jets get their choice of 2 of the top 4 QBs.
Browns, NYG, Jets, Browns, Broncos, Colts. We all knwo the Bills will try to move up for a QB, but with this move by the Jets, their only realistic hope is to make the NYG an offer they can't refuse. And the Giants still might refuse so they can take Rosen.
It's possible that the Bills, with all that draft ammunition, might not be able to move up for a QB. Crazy
Unless Mayfield is really their guy, a sentiment being discussed in NY now, and feel really strong about him being there at 3
it's an opinion ass hole
get the fuck over it
Absolutely. Or they trade down and get a huge ransom with the leverage they have given the Broncos pick at 5. Win-Win deal for the Browns.Assuming the Giants are going QB, as well as the Jets with this trade, then I guess the early 'winners' are the Browns. Get to pick the two players they want.
who I root for....LOL
that tops Brownsiest Browns.
Take it down the hall shithead
Damn, Ninja'dIf the Browns love one QB they always had to take him at No. 1. No way you roll the dice and hope that he falls to No. 4.
This trade simply confirmed what could have happened on draft day. And if the Giants DON'T want a QB, they could trade down as well and pull in an even bigger haul than the Colts got.
The results based analysis and scarcity drive this, not good process and research. You and I both know that.Awful trade for the Jets. None of these QBs are even remotely close to worth giving up that much for
I'll disagree.Awful trade for the Jets. None of these QBs are even remotely close to worth giving up that much for
Awful trade for the Jets. None of these QBs are even remotely close to worth giving up that much for
As with all of these trades involving QB's, you don't make the trade because probability says its a good idea (it's not) you do it because if you're right the dividends are huge.I heard the same thing when the Eagles traded for Wentz.