- Thread starter
- #1
Tis the reason Id go side A. I think Langford becomes nothing special. And having Donald plus a first next year sets u up nicely.If you believe in Langford, it's easily side B....
And I love Donald. He is a beast.
Pretty much depends on your roster.I said B, becuase you fill more holes. If you don't NEED a Jeremy Langford..if you've got at leat 2-3 start worthy RB's, than yeah, it's A
Yea I am a huge fan of Aaron Donald and I gave up a lot to get him. The guy offered me Langford, Fleener (whom I like a lot and he knows it) and McCoy as a back plan for DT, but we start 1 DT and 2 DE for our linemen and a guy that can put up numbers at the DT position to me is a huge advantage. I have Dion Lewis /James White, Rawls, and Foster so Im not in horrible shape so I holding off for now and keeping Donald and my pick
Where is he playing at again this year? ? I forget. .maybe not horrible shape, but definitely not good shape. Lewis could just a flash in the pan as well.Yea I am a huge fan of Aaron Donald and I gave up a lot to get him. The guy offered me Langford, Fleener (whom I like a lot and he knows it) and McCoy as a back plan for DT, but we start 1 DT and 2 DE for our linemen and a guy that can put up numbers at the DT position to me is a huge advantage. I have Dion Lewis /James White, Rawls, and Foster so Im not in horrible shape so I holding off for now and keeping Donald and my pick