- Thread starter
- #1
The packers were robbed. It may be a tie but still the packers should have won.
I’m trying to think of a game in recent memory where the refs dictated the outcome as much as this one.
Did you watch?Prolly the last time the Packers lost.
yup..Did you watch?
Yeah the Rodgers mind boggling fumble play was definitely a WTF moment.yup..
I didn't like the call against Matthews, but the rule is shit to begin with. Anytime they leave their feet, you could say they're driving em' to the ground. It's a shit rule, but not near as shitty as they're playcalling and execution on the last series to get the FG, by the Packers.
Funny too, cuz it's almost identical to what the BEars did last week, leaving open the door, by getting too cute with the playcalling, after Howard had been marching all over em' prior to.
Yeah the Rodgers mind boggling fumble play was definitely a WTF moment.
Game should been sealed before that though. It’s funny how a ref thinks he’s keeping players safe by calling roughing the passer when that call literally extended the game by 30+ plays.
Not really. Cousins should have had at least two if not three interceptions and about 115 less yards passing.Hey, they were trying to help the Packers win it just didn't turn out that way!
Not the same.They called the same thing on Kendricks!
More like Refs W 0, L 0, T 1, Packers W 0, L 0, T 1Not really. Cousins should have had at least two if not three interceptions and about 115 less yards passing.
Ref 1 Packers 0
We're not Minnesota fans and we don't blame the refs.Not the same.