How hard will you LOL if Misery wins the SEC East?

[BigAppleBadger]

Why would you laugh? They appear to be a really good team. I'm not sure I get it.

Because they're still a B12 scrub and would have won one of the divisions of the best conference in the land.

 

[LawDawg]

Because they're still a B12 scrub and would have won one of the divisions of the best conference in the land.

And therefore would have won the BigXII. So again, I don't get it.

 

[BigAppleBadger]

And therefore would have won the BigXII. So again, I don't get it.

No. That's the thing, they were never competitive in the B12. So it would mean that the SEC East sucks.

 

[LawDawg]

No. That's the thing, they were never competitive in the B12. So it would mean that the SEC East sucks.

Are you that dumb?

• In 3 of their last 4 years they were division champs. Is that never?
• They are going to be better with SEC recruiting advantage.
• TAMU was 5th in the SEC last year curb stomped the Big12 champ last year, meaning past performance doesn't dictate future performance. Doesn't take a genius to see that.

East down? Sure seems that way after today. Sucks? Only in your envy adled mind. A good chance you'll get to play one of us in a bowl game and we know how that typically works out, don't we?

 

[BigAppleBadger]

You're right, we usually beat SEC West teams.

 

[Clayton]

I don't know if it is funny.
But, it would be one of the more shocking things ever if they won the SEC.

They are known for never winning conference titles.

They went 0 for 17 in the Big 12.
I think they went 1 for 31 in the Big 8.

It would be insane to think they would finally get a conference title and it would be the SEC.

I doubt it.

They will probably get destroyed by the West winner.

Yeah, but we are also known for being consistently good as of late. We wouldve broken through the soft Big 12 this year if we were still in that league.

I do think we'll lose to Bama by quite a bit if we get that far

 

[LawDawg]

You're right, we usually beat SEC West teams.

LOL ... criticize the east then brag about your 2-6 record against the SEC where all 6 losses are against the east. You get weaker with every post.

 

[LawDawg]

You're right, we usually beat SEC West teams.

By the way, can you define "never" for me? Must mean something different in Wisconsin.

 

[potzer25]

TAMU and Mizzou were definitely better adds than Arkansas and SCAR...

 

[Red_Alert]

Are you that dumb?

• In 3 of their last 4 years they were division champs. Is that never?
• They are going to be better with SEC recruiting advantage.
• TAMU was 5th in the SEC last year curb stomped the Big12 champ last year, meaning past performance doesn't dictate future performance. Doesn't take a genius to see that.

East down? Sure seems that way after today. Sucks? Only in your envy adled mind. A good chance you'll get to play one of us in a bowl game and we know how that typically works out, don't we?

False statement.

2011 There were no divisions and they finished 5th.
2010 "Co-Champ", But lost the head-to-head with Nebraska. Nebraska in CCG
2009 Nebraska lone division champs.
2008 Co-champs Won head to head vs Nebraska

So at best you can say they were division champs twice. Only one of those were champs by head-to-head.

They didn't win any outright.

 

[Shanemansj13]

I have been waiting for this forever. Finally a different team at top

 

[LawDawg]

False statement.

2011 There were no divisions and they finished 5th.
2010 "Co-Champ", But lost the head-to-head with Nebraska. Nebraska in CCG
2009 Nebraska lone division champs.
2008 Co-champs Won head to head vs Nebraska

So at best you can say they were division champs twice. Only one of those were champs by head-to-head.

They didn't win any outright.

Never said won any outright. 2007 2008 2010 co-champs. My point is the same, if not perfect. I was doing it from memory.

 

[Hornsstampede2.0]

Quit making Missouri anything other than a Big 12 also ran.

They had a horrifically bad record vs. Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Texas.
They were not even remotely close to .500 versus the Big 12 power teams.

Official finishes in the Big 12:
7, 5, 5, 11, 10, 9, 10, 6, 9, 7, 5, 2, 5, 6, 4, 5

They never won a league title.
They went 4-5 in their bowl games.
They finished ranked in the top 10 ONCE in 17 Big 12 season.
They finished ranked only 5 times.

Missouri is a GREAT basketball school.
That is their primary identity.

They are a very mediocre football school.
That is why it would be frankly stunning for them to win an SEC title.

 

[KansasSooner]

Quit making Missouri anything other than a Big 12 also ran.

They had a horrifically bad record vs. Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Texas.
They were not even remotely close to .500 versus the Big 12 power teams.

Official finishes in the Big 12:
7, 5, 5, 11, 10, 9, 10, 6, 9, 7, 5, 2, 5, 6, 4, 5

They never won a league title.
They went 4-5 in their bowl games.
They finished ranked in the top 10 ONCE in 17 Big 12 season.
They finished ranked only 5 times.

Missouri is a GREAT basketball school.
That is their primary identity.

They are a very mediocre football school.
That is why it would be frankly stunning for them to win an SEC title.

KU fans might not agree with them being a great basketball school...

 

[Red_Alert]

Never said won any outright. 2007 2008 2010 co-champs. My point is the same, if not perfect. I was doing it from memory.

You said

"In 3 of their last 4 years they were division champs"

That is a false statement. The best you can say is division co-champs twice.

 

[HuskerOC]

Never said won any outright. 2007 2008 2010 co-champs. My point is the same, if not perfect. I was doing it from memory.

What is notable is that you are now arguing semantics about a team you considered an also-ran in a shit Big 12 North and Big 12 conference not all that long ago.

Texas A&M and Missouri were going to be nothing more than scheduling fodder for the rest of the SEC in doing nothing more than creating more TV sets and recruits for the heavyweights of the SEC to feed upon. Now that they are in the SEC, you have found them to be more than competitive, and actually even capable of winning a division in the SEC.

You have gone from 7 straight Natty's to, ...well they won 3 of 4 Big 12 North titles before they got to the SEC, so they are legit.

Keep backpedaling. Come next year you may be chirping their tune for winning a 9th straight SEC National Championship.

 

[LawDawg]

You said

"In 3 of their last 4 years they were division champs"

That is a false statement. The best you can say is division co-champs twice.

Whatever, dude. You get my point. Missouri was not a scrub, as this post alleges, the past 4 or 5 years so it is no surprise they are being competitive in the SEC. I was surprised they started off so badly last year.

The post I was responding to said "never." Your "division co-chair twice" is sufficient to prove the point I was making.

 

[Red_Alert]

That Clemson is getting rolled tonight doesn't help the SEC East Missouri debate...

Clemson beat a healthy Georgia.

 

[brin3535]

It could happen. Of course, Obamacare could be repealed next week too, though its just as unlikely.

Quit making Missouri anything other than a Big 12 also ran.

They had a horrifically bad record vs. Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Texas.
They were not even remotely close to .500 versus the Big 12 power teams.

Official finishes in the Big 12:
7, 5, 5, 11, 10, 9, 10, 6, 9, 7, 5, 2, 5, 6, 4, 5

They never won a league title.
They went 4-5 in their bowl games.
They finished ranked in the top 10 ONCE in 17 Big 12 season.
They finished ranked only 5 times.

Missouri is a GREAT basketball school.
That is their primary identity.

They are a very mediocre football school.
That is why it would be frankly stunning for them to win an SEC title.

Why are all you texas fans so butthurt about mizzou? Its pretty odd.

 

[BigAppleBadger]

Missouri was a scrub. No one thought of them as an elite team in the B12. Their nickname is Misery, for fuck's sake.

That is why this is funny. You are making it more so, because now this thread is a classic Team SEC nut-hanging.