- Thread starter
- #1
rolltide14_0
~V--I--P~
I saw this on espn a few minutes ago and I thought it was interesting. One of the guys said Gurley, his position was that you can get more out of Gurley because he's a RB and can get the ball 20-30 times a game. The other guy took Cooper because although you can only get the ball to him 10 times a game, most of those will be big plays.
Honestly, I'd take Cooper. Reason number one is because I'm a homer, but the second reason is that I think good running backs are easier to come by than a dominant WR. The WR is going to make it much easier on the QB when he's the type of guy that can not only get open, but still make plays in one on one or even two on one situations.
Honestly, I'd take Cooper. Reason number one is because I'm a homer, but the second reason is that I think good running backs are easier to come by than a dominant WR. The WR is going to make it much easier on the QB when he's the type of guy that can not only get open, but still make plays in one on one or even two on one situations.