- Thread starter
- #1
nathans8823
Well-Known Notre Dame Fan
I say Stanford wins this one.. but close
Not a good start for StanfordI hope Stanford wins - The conference needs both them and UW to win tonight.
People thought I was joking when i said wtch out for Colorado. They've improved a lot. Weak PI call imo not awful. But it was pretty closeNot at all...but dem Buffs
People thought I was joking when i said wtch out for Colorado. They've improved a lot. Weak PI call imo not awful. But it was pretty close
I agree I have to give them credit. If not for a few special teams disasters. I think they had the upset vs MichiganTO be fair - I was saying the same. I liked what they had been putting together.
Anyways, congrats to the Buffs.
It's actually kinda quiet here lol where is @DJ at
Wow, no targeting? PSU LB was called early cause he it UM WR shoulder pad.
Definite targeting PAC officials are the worstWow, no targeting? PSU LB was called early cause he it UM WR shoulder pad.
I was just going to post the same thing. If PSU's LB who was ejected 'targeted' -- That UCLA guy was straight head hunting.
I have a feeling the "targeting" penalty is going to be like the NFL's "the catch process", where no one knows how they are going to call it.
I thought the same thing about the catch rule. Its ridiculous the refs reviewed it and came to the same conclusion. Guy had his bell rung.
That is what blows my mind. The PSU guy looked like he was trying to go for the ball and his shoulder pad hit Perry's head. Targeting and thrown out.
The UCLA guy leads with the crown of his helmet and basically knocks the guy who with a helmet to helmet hit -- no penalty, no targeting and the turnover stands?!?!?!
I felt bad for the PSU guy, as I thought it was the wrong call. After watching this one -- I have no idea what is the right or wrong call anymore.
Reminded me of the Joe Bolden B.S. call against MSU last year