- Thread starter
- #1
pabartl787
Well-Known Member
Has now become a reality......
NCAA Football: Council approves process to allow 5-7 teams into bowl games
NCAA Football: Council approves process to allow 5-7 teams into bowl games
Hard to believe that we still support this shit, when it's clear that all they care about is the money. We really shouldn't watch their shitty bowl games, but I know I will anyway.
I'll be watching whatever bowl game PSU is in, the CFP, Rose Bowl and MAYBE a couple of others. That's it though.
Yeah I won't really watch every single one, but I'll watch a lot of them. I just love football too much.
Part of this is the consumer's fault. Two 5-7 teams could be playing and it would probably get better ratings than the two best teams in hockey playing.its a joke. they'll have 4 win teams going soon. nothing but certificate of participation bowl games. check the stands of these lower tier bowl games, hardly anyone in the stands. Cameramen are told not to pan up too much in some of these for a reason.
Sugar should stil be good, Alamo, holday, Russel Athletic, Music City, Citrus, OutbackI'll be watching whatever bowl game PSU is in, the CFP, Rose Bowl and MAYBE a couple of others. That's it though.
Husker fans will be so happyHas now become a reality......
NCAA Football: Council approves process to allow 5-7 teams into bowl games
one of the spots should go to Virginia to stop scheduling bowl eligibility. They scheduled really good OOC games and should be rewarded instead of penalized. Unfortunately, the lack of a head coach and their APR might make that not possible.
UVA is 4-8. If they were 5-7, I'd agree for them being one of those getting a bowl considering their OOC. Looking back at their schedule, they only had 3 games decided by more than a score with those being UCLA, BSU and UNC. Came damn close to pulling off the ND game too.
You are correct, sir. Don't know why I thought the winner of the UVA-VT game would be bowl eligible. I retract my statement about the wahoos going bowling! Lol