2017 Division Prediction Thread

[CowboyB]

I see perfectly clear. You were bitch slapped mightily on that thread and just can't get yourself to admit you were wrong..........again

loser

I'm not wrong the Vikings would be in a lot worse shape had they relied on a backup and teddy Bridgwater to return this year.

 

[packerzrule]

I'm not wrong the Vikings would be in a lot worse shape had they relied on a backup and teddy Bridgwater to return this year.

hardly the point

you said "The Vikings will be in the NFCCG BECAUSE of Sam Bradford". then made multiple posts in support of that

so yes, you are wrong

 

[CowboyB]

hardly the point

you said "The Vikings will be in the NFCCG BECAUSE of Sam Bradford". then made multiple posts in support of that

so yes, you are wrong

I made that BEFORE Adrian Peterson got injured.

Stop it already. You're upset I've said mean things about you. You're not the first to act butt hurt and bitter.

 

[packerzrule]

I made that BEFORE Adrian Peterson got injured.

Stop it already. You're upset I've said mean things about you. You're not the first to act butt hurt and bitter.

you're such a dumbass

when Peterson was healthy, albeit a few weeks, he didn't do squat

as usual, you grasp at straws to defend the indefensible

as far as being bitter, I only need to look at your signature to remind me of what bitterness truly means



hahahaha

 

[PhilSimms11]

AFC East
(1)NE (13-3)
MIA (7-9)
BUF (5-11)
NYJ (1-15)

AFC North
(3)PIT (11-5)
(6)BAL (9-7)*
CIN (8-8)
CLE (4-12)

AFC South
(4)TEN (10-6)*
HOU (9-7)
IND (7-9)
JAX (4-12)

AFC West
(2)OAK (12-4)
(5)DEN (10-6)*
KC (9-7)
LAC (6-10)
----------
NFC East
(2)NYG (12-4)
DAL (10-6)
WAS (8-8)
PHI (7-9)

NFC North
(1)GB (12-4)
DET (9-7)
MIN (7-9)
CHI (3-13)

NFC South
(3)TB (11-5)*
(5)CAR (10-6)*
(6)ATL (10-6)
NO (8-8)

NFC West
(4)SEA (10-6)
ARZ (8-8)
LAR (4-12)
SF (3-13)

Out from last season: HOU, KC, MIA; DAL, DET. New ones marked with (*).

(6)BAL (9-7) @ (3)PIT (11-5)
(5)DEN (10-6) @ (4)TEN (10-6)

DEN @ (1)NE (13-3)
PIT @ (2)OAK (12-4)

PIT @NE
----------
(6)ATL (10-6) @ (3)TB (11-5)
(5)CAR (10-6) @ (4)SEA (10-6)

ATL @ (1)GB (12-4)
SEA @ (2)NYG (12-4)

NYG @ GB
----------
Super Bowl LII--PIT vs GB.

 

[PDay8810]

with reasonable health

AFC: New England, Pittsburgh, Tennessee, Oakland
NFC: Dallas, Green Bay, Atlanta, Seattle

 

[Uhsplit]

Get over it. Not having Peterson back there is a huge difference. This is 2017 now.

No offense but anyone who has stood up for Sam should expect to get dissed over it. His performance on the field has given his detractors plenty of ammo.
Sam is a bum plain and simple.
For the Seahawks, the Rams were much easier to beat when he was their QB.

 

[soxfan1468927]

AFC East
(1)NE (13-3)
MIA (7-9)
BUF (5-11)
NYJ (1-15)

AFC North
(3)PIT (11-5)
(6)BAL (9-7)*
CIN (8-8)
CLE (4-12)

AFC South
(4)TEN (10-6)*
HOU (9-7)
IND (7-9)
JAX (4-12)

AFC West
(2)OAK (12-4)
(5)DEN (10-6)*
KC (9-7)
LAC (6-10)
----------
NFC East
(2)NYG (12-4)
DAL (10-6)
WAS (8-8)
PHI (7-9)

NFC North
(1)GB (12-4)
DET (9-7)
MIN (7-9)
CHI (3-13)

NFC South
(3)TB (11-5)*
(5)CAR (10-6)*
(6)ATL (10-6)
NO (8-8)

NFC West
(4)SEA (10-6)
ARZ (8-8)
LAR (4-12)
SF (3-13)

Out from last season: HOU, KC, MIA; DAL, DET. New ones marked with (*).

(6)BAL (9-7) @ (3)PIT (11-5)
(5)DEN (10-6) @ (4)TEN (10-6)

DEN @ (1)NE (13-3)
PIT @ (2)OAK (12-4)

PIT @NE
----------
(6)ATL (10-6) @ (3)TB (11-5)
(5)CAR (10-6) @ (4)SEA (10-6)

ATL @ (1)GB (12-4)
SEA @ (2)NYG (12-4)

NYG @ GB
----------
Super Bowl LII--PIT vs GB.

Pittsburgh coming into NE and beating the Pats would be something. 0-5 against the Pats at Foxboro with Brady at QB and have been outscored by an average score of 37-19.

 

[CowboyB]

No offense but anyone who has stood up for Sam should expect to get dissed over it. His performance on the field has given his detractors plenty of ammo.
Sam is a bum plain and simple.
For the Seahawks, the Rams were much easier to beat when he was their QB.

He had a top 6 Quarterback rating last year. You can look at the facts if you want to comment or continue to have an irrelevant opinion.

 

[CowboyB]

you're such a dumbass

when Peterson was healthy, albeit a few weeks, he didn't do squat

as usual, you grasp at straws to defend the indefensible

as far as being bitter, I only need to look at your signature to remind me of what bitterness truly means



hahahaha

Sam Bradford had the 6th best quarterback rating last year and he threw less interceptions than Aaron Rogers.

You can continue acting all emotional because I have said mean things about you but it won't change the fact you don't know what you are talking about.

 

[packerzrule]

Sam Bradford had the 6th best quarterback rating last year and he threw less interceptions than Aaron Rogers.

You can continue acting all emotional because I have said mean things about you but it won't change the fact you don't know what you are talking about.

hahahaha

emotional???

hahahaha

your continued support of Bradford is further proof that you are a dumb ass who knows nothing about football

 

[CowboyB]

hahahaha

emotional???

hahahaha

your continued support of Bradford is further proof that you are a dumb ass who knows nothing about football

He had a top 6 Quarterback record. The proof is in the stats.

 

[packerzrule]

He had a top 6 Quarterback record. The proof is in the stats.

link?

 

[CowboyB]

link?

2016 NFL Passing | Pro-Football-Reference.com

 

[packerzrule]

2016 NFL Passing | Pro-Football-Reference.com

hmmm, 1st in Completion % but 17th in QBR and 23 in TD%

yep, looks like you got me

 

[CowboyB]

hmmm, 1st in Completion % but 17th in QBR and 23 in TD%

yep, looks like you got me

He had a shitty team. The bottom line is he threw less interceptions than A-Rogers, had a top 6 quarterback rating and only dumbasses care about ESPN's dumbass QBR stat.

 

[packerzrule]

He had a shitty team. The bottom line is he threw less interceptions than A-Rogers, had a top 6 quarterback rating and only dumbasses care about ESPN's dumbass QBR stat.

and only desperate fools hang their hats on Completion percentage when gauging a QB

but, whatever comforts your bruised psyche

 

[CowboyB]

and only desperate fools hang their hats on Completion percentage when gauging a QB

but, whatever comforts your bruised psyche

I never said anything about completion percentage.

I promise if you stop being so fucking emotional you will see things more clearly.

 

[packerzrule]

I never said anything about completion percentage.

I promise if you stop being so fucking emotional you will see things more clearly.

other that Completion and yards lost per sacks, where is your boy top rated?

 

[CowboyB]

other that Completion and yards lost per sacks, where is your boy top rated?

Use your brain. I already stated it.