12 Team PPR Dynasty Trade Help

[averagejoe]

How would you rank these 3 TE in dynasty?

Spoiler: Foot Spellchecker

spelling is courtesy of Foot

Hockenspock (det)
Dizzley (sea)
Font (den)

 

[Shanemansj13]

How would you rank these 3 TE in dynasty?

Spoiler: Foot Spellchecker

spelling is courtesy of Foot

Hockenspock (det)
Dizzley (sea)
Font (den)

This is tough. I have eliminate Fant bc of the future QB dilemma. Right now Flacco isnt a long-term option but is Lock the real deal...too many question marks when the Lions and Seahawks don't have that problem.

I love Hockenson and I have him in two leagues, all these guys are studs and should be in the league a long time but I am going to go with Dissly on this one...even though I don't have a problem with HOck or Diss at this point. I think Hock can be more of a big play guy but I think Diss can be more of a redzone target and at this point I have to take the redzone target.

1. Dissly
2. Hock
3. Fant

 

[SmokingMonkey]

agree with most everything said above

Dissly over the Hawkeye TEs for this year/future outlook - primo spot for TE right now, where they don't have a true target hog WR but they have a good QB who puts up pts, regardless if they are run heavy team.

I'm not sold on Stafford heavily targeting the TE outside of the rare instances they play a team that literally has no clue how to guard a TE (ahem, Arizona), so you're in a similar position as Dissly only with a worse QB.

Fant was always a yr2 guy imo, that would need some developing, and as mentioned, he has the worst QB situation of the three, both short term and long term

 

[femurov]

I think the rookies are more talented, but opportunity is the question. Honestly, I find it hard to believe that Dissly is going to keep this pace up. For a dynasty, I think I would go Hock, Fant, Dissly.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Dissy
Hockenson
Fant

 

[Barilko]

^^^^^^ This

Our Seattle guy is homerizing(Made that up in a Sam type way)

Or does our Seattle guy know

I’m going with Harold knows

 

[averagejoe]

@Shanemansj13 @SmokingMonkey @femurov @HaroldSeattle @Barilko

Thanks for the input.
I get the hesitation on Fant, but isn't a TE a rookie QB's best friend? Just saying.

Related question:
Would you rather have either Humphries or Richardson?

 

[Shanemansj13]

@Shanemansj13 @SmokingMonkey @femurov @HaroldSeattle @Barilko

Thanks for the input.
I get the hesitation on Fant, but isn't a TE a rookie QB's best friend? Just saying.

Related question:
Would you rather have either Humphries or Richardson?

At this point...Richardson.

Too bad for Humphries...had a huge year last year and now he is bunched in the middle of all these TEN young WR's

 

[femurov]

@Shanemansj13 @SmokingMonkey @femurov @HaroldSeattle @Barilko

Thanks for the input.
I get the hesitation on Fant, but isn't a TE a rookie QB's best friend? Just saying.

Related question:
Would you rather have either Humphries or Richardson?

Flip a coin. I think I could go with Richardson for dynasty, though.

 

[SmokingMonkey]

@Shanemansj13 @SmokingMonkey @femurov @HaroldSeattle @Barilko

Thanks for the input.
I get the hesitation on Fant, but isn't a TE a rookie QB's best friend? Just saying.

Related question:
Would you rather have either Humphries or Richardson?

Humphries for me - I'm scared of what a starting QB Haskins means for McLaurin and PRich.
Yes, we all know Keenum isn't great, but he at least throws it where they can catch it, even if that means that the D can catch it too.

Really don't think either are worth more than a back end bench spot, easily dumped for anything of value that pops up over the course of the season

 

[TKOSpikes]

Whistling Dissly

Option C (but Richardson over Hump)

 

[SteelersPride]

hock
dissly
fant