- Thread starter
- #1
Mitziman
i know you don't like to hear the truth, but...
Perhaps the local D.C. press will treat “Cuzie” like they do Sean Spicer if he doesn’t sign a long-term contract before the season.
Perhaps the local D.C. press will treat “Cuzie” like they do Sean Spicer if he doesn’t sign a long-term contract before the season.
And there in lies the rub. Will Bruce make a realistic offer. He has to realize at this point that he isn't going to get him on the cheap and that no home town discount is coming. Read yesterday that there has been no offer extended for a month. I just don't understand what he is waiting for unless, contrary to what he states, he is waiting to see if any one offers a great deal in a trade before the draft. It sure wouldn't be the first time that Bruce has outright lied. You would think that they could have used the dismissal of SM as a reason to re-open the negotiations and get this thing done asap. But if you don't engage and make offers, Cousins isn't going to have a change of heart and just come and sign a $20M/year deal (which apparently was the last offer from the team). Nope, the starting point now has got to be a deal similar to Luck's.IM thinking if Bruce makes a realistic offer, Kirk signs. BUt the man aint going to take a 60% deal which seems to be about what Brucie is offering.
Its interesting that, in the fan's eyes and some in the media, that Bruce has taken the place of Dan as the idiot in the front office. I have to wonder if this is by design on Dan's part. Dan becomes invisible to the outside world and let Bruce be the fall guy. This would go a long way to explaining why Bruce is still around.
I@Stymietee Whats best and whats worst are subjective. As many here have made it quite clear they feel its in the teams best interest NOT to sign Kirk long term unless its on the cheap, and even then they feel we might be better not signing him at all.
@Sportster 72 The one year deals at some point become unsustainable. With a roster of 53, and an average of 7 draft picks, if half your roster were on one year deals averaging $4M a year, thats $106M, and if guys like Pryor actually perform, at some point the price goes up.
I
Maybe I shouldn't have said new norm as if 27 players on a team are going to be on a one year contract. I think we are going to continue to see one year deals for another couple of years at least. We will see what happens.
Its interesting that, in the fan's eyes and some in the media, that Bruce has taken the place of Dan as the idiot in the front office. I have to wonder if this is by design on Dan's part. Dan becomes invisible to the outside world and let Bruce be the fall guy. This would go a long way to explaining why Bruce is still around.
@Stymietee Whats best and whats worst are subjective. As many here have made it quite clear they feel its in the teams best interest NOT to sign Kirk long term unless its on the cheap, and even then they feel we might be better not signing him at all.
I don't think many (if any) have proclaimed they want to see KC gone...actually I think it's quite the opposite. And your version of a "cheap" deal is what many of us feel is a "fair" deal. Yeah... the FO has low balled him to some degree, but don't act like no fault lies in KC and his agents corner because they are trying to eek every damn penny they can out if this situation. You think that KC feels a little slighted?? How do you think the gonna feel after KC sucks $45 mill out of Dan's account over the course of a couple years and then tells them to fuck off.
Sure, Allen/Snyder have some fault, but it's becoming obvious that the 2 sides are quite far apart which tells me that KC is acting like a greedy little fucker as well and that anything much less than the Luck deal and he isn't even thinking about it.
If you were in his shoes, would you be willing to do this team a solid considering everything that lead to this point?? Again dude, if you knew for a fact that your job would have paid the guy you replaced MORE than you are asking for, would you cut them a solid?? If you say you would handle it any differently I would call bullshit.
I understand what your saying Shark, but let's examine what led up to this point...
A) RG3 is drafted 2nd Overall...KC is drafted in the 4th Round. Everyone knows RG is THE GUY and KC is the backup/insurance policy.
B) Despite Griffin's first great year, he is injury prone and fails to adjust to the Pro game. The FO takes the RG3 experiment as far as it will go because people have invested a lot of time, $$, and draft picks in him.
C) RG experiment fails... in walks Captain Kirk, he has one, count it, ONE good, NOT GREAT, year where he stumbles us into the playoffs, Redskins offer him a "fair" short term deal, for him to prove he belongs, he balls it up and throws it in the trash. He's better than that.
D) Fast forward to now, similar situation as C, only we are offering more $$$. Some would call it a smack in the face, and it is a bit of a low ball deal (I am sure very negotiable).
But why should he feel slighted when he hasn't really accomplished enough to warrant a $25 mill annual salary with 60-70 mill fully guaranteed...
I don't think many (if any) have proclaimed they want to see KC gone...actually I think it's quite the opposite. And your version of a "cheap" deal is what many of us feel is a "fair" deal. Yeah... the FO has low balled him to some degree, but don't act like no fault lies in KC and his agents corner because they are trying to eek every damn penny they can out if this situation. You think that KC feels a little slighted?? How do you think the gonna feel after KC sucks $45 mill out of Dan's account over the course of a couple years and then tells them to fuck off.
Sure, Allen/Snyder have some fault, but it's becoming obvious that the 2 sides are quite far apart which tells me that KC is acting like a greedy little fucker as well and that anything much less than the Luck deal and he isn't even thinking about it.
Isn't that his agent's job? Wouldn't you want the same type of representation if you were in that situation? I've maintained all along that if the FO would extend a fair deal, they would see give on the other side and this deal would get done.I don't think many (if any) have proclaimed they want to see KC gone...actually I think it's quite the opposite. And your version of a "cheap" deal is what many of us feel is a "fair" deal. Yeah... the FO has low balled him to some degree, but don't act like no fault lies in KC and his agents corner because they are trying to eek every damn penny they can out if this situation. You think that KC feels a little slighted?? How do you think the gonna feel after KC sucks $45 mill out of Dan's account over the course of a couple years and then tells them to fuck off.
Sure, Allen/Snyder have some fault, but it's becoming obvious that the 2 sides are quite far apart which tells me that KC is acting like a greedy little fucker as well and that anything much less than the Luck deal and he isn't even thinking about it.
VTSparks said:]You think that KC feels a little slighted?? How do you think the gonna feel after KC sucks $45 mill out of Dan's account over the course of a couple years and then tells them to fuck off.