DirtDirtDirt
Well-Known Member
People actually think OJ didnt do it?
Oh Boy
Oh Boy
Did you read comment #134?
"The only blood that was found at OJ's house was the following: "Pair of dark, crumpled socks found at the foot of Simpson's bed; DNA tests found the genetic markers of Simpson and his ex-wife".
Prosecution: contended this directly linked a victim to Simpson.
Defense: suggested socks were planted at house by police, then blood was put on socks later at the police lab to frame Simpson; most compelling evidence of tampering is that some blood soaked all the way through one sock to other side, which it shouldn't have done if a foot was in it".
Today they would never take blood from OJ so there would never be any to "plant". They would just swab his cheek. If this happened today, it would be a complete open and shut case.
People actually think OJ didnt do it?
Oh Boy
Whatever, it's not that easy and it happened over 20 years ago and maybe if it happened today, OJ's DNA would not match what was found at the crime scene. Both you and I are only assuming what happened then and what would have happened today,And again....they would have never had a drop of OJ's blood to plant. It is hard to create and buy any of these conspiracy's when you have multiple tests done saying it is Simpson's blood which police never have access to.
Really the single drop of his blood at the crime scene in today's era of testing and people giving so much credence to DNA testing makes it a pretty easy case.
There is enough evidence to make it questionable. I'm fairly sure he had something to do it, and that makes him guilty anyway, I'm just not convinced he was the actual knife-man.
It called "reasonable doubt".There is enough evidence to make it questionable. I'm fairly sure he had something to do it, and that makes him guilty anyway, I'm just not convinced he was the actual knife-man.
The defense successfully turned the case into the Mark Fuhrman trial, thats where they won that trial......Mark Fuhrman being a brutal racist should have been a complete sidenote, and it became the entire show
I suggest you watch the A&E special "OJ-The Secret Tapes".....He all but admits to the killings as he is about to commit suicide....His closest friends had to come to the conclusion that he committed the murder.....
That tape was/is not enough evidence to convict OJ.The defense successfully turned the case into the Mark Fuhrman trial, thats where they won that trial......Mark Fuhrman being a brutal racist should have been a complete sidenote, and it became the entire show
I suggest you watch the A&E special "OJ-The Secret Tapes".....He all but admits to the killings as he is about to commit suicide....His closest friends had to come to the conclusion that he committed the murder.....
I am 99% sure the OJ did it too. But we were questioning whether you could actually prove that in court. The fact that Fuhrman was involved alone raises questions. And I have watched that show along with other documentaries about the case. They never prove beyond a doubt that he did it. They definitely make it look extremely likely that he did it, but criminal court requires an extremely strict burden of proof that failed to show.
Mark Furman jumped over the fence at OJ's without a search warrant and found a bloody glove that didn't fit OJ's hand. Furman also contaminated evidences when he jumped the fence without wearing gloves himself.The defense successfully turned the case into the Mark Fuhrman trial, thats where they won that trial......Mark Fuhrman being a brutal racist should have been a complete sidenote, and it became the entire show
I suggest you watch the A&E special "OJ-The Secret Tapes".....He all but admits to the killings as he is about to commit suicide....His closest friends had to come to the conclusion that he committed the murder.....
That tape was/is not enough evidence to convict OJ.
Just because a husband and wife have a few fights, doesn't mean that he will kill you.We live in a day and age where if the actual crime isnt caught on tape, you have a good chance of walking if you have the money to hire the right defense....prisons are full of young men that have been convicted with FAR less proof of guilt than they had on OJ.....The endless tapes and police records of OJ spending years brutalizing this woman should have been enough to prove that no one else had the motive to slaughter her in the way he had
Mark Furman jumped over the fence at OJ's without a search warrant and found a bloody glove that didn't fit OJ's hand. Furman also contaminated evidences when he jumped the fence without wearing gloves himself.
Just because a husband and wife have a few fights, doesn't mean that he will kill you.
What was obvious in the OJ case? Like I said before, just because you have a domestic abuse case filed against you, doesn't mean you are going to kill someone.The accumulation of evidence, from what was found that night, to his attempted suicide in the SUV, his stalking her and her new boyfriend, to the years of domestic abuse.....At some point, its pretty easy to conclude the obvious
They still take blood for testing to be used in US courts. Taking of blood is protected under 4th amendment rights, but it is still possible as long a warrant is obtained by a judge. You can bet your house in the case of a double homicide the court will be taking blood from anyone accused. The link below is mainly about DWI but it covers 4th amendment rights regarding general blood taking as well.
Can Police Force Drunken Driving Suspects To Take Blood Tests?
So??? The glove didn't fit then and it still wouldn't have fit in today's trial.OJ took diabetic medicine......When he stopped taking it, his body swelled....He was instructed to stop taking it days prior to trying on the glove
This came straight from the mouth of his best friend Robert Kardashian in the documentary I mentioned earlier....
What was obvious in the OJ case? Like I said before, just because you have a domestic abuse case filed against you, doesn't mean you are going to kill someone.