No wonder Arian Foster's back is tweaked

[HizzleRocker]

Horrible law suit and should get dismissed on summary judgment, imo. However, she will get but loads of child support payments.

On another note, kinda sad to hear this. I recently read an article about things he had written to his daughter, how he is a good father, etc.... It seemed genuine, and still well may be. However, this can only hurt his family and his kid.

 

[Texas Jefe]

Yeah, it stinks for his kid, and stinks the kid on the way may someday read about all this irresponsible behavior.

 

[wood20ks]

Shes a gold digging ho-bag........Needs punched in the mouth a few times.

arian is a dumass....Needs punched in the mouth a few times.......

He still needs to pay for child support and she should only spend money on the child.And she NEEDS to help PAY.
if the child wants something outlandish,well the child needs to talk to Dad about that.

They need to set something up for the child as to where gold digging ho-bags like that do not profit off his cash.
she deserves nothing!

 

[Oldschool739]

A University of Houston senior claims she is pregnant with Texans star running back Arian Foster's son and that the football player has been pressuring her to get an abortion.


Brittany Norwood, 20, says she started dating Foster about a year ago and fell in love with him without ever knowing he had a wife and kids.


Now Norwood is suing Foster for child support, a restraining order and damages due to the emotional distress he has caused her.

When she got pregnant, she says Foster and members of his family started harassing her about an abortion.


'He’s like, "You can’t have this, you can’t have this kid, like, we cannot bring a child into this, like, think about my kids,"' Norwood told KHOU.


Foster also pushed the abortion issue in a series of text messages.


'You just can’t bring a life into this world under these circumstances. It’s not fair to anyone. It’s not just about you,' one message read, according to Norwood.


Even Foster's brother Abdul appealed to her to end the pregnancy.


'He’s like, "You know, if you loved Arian at all you would have an abortion because this child is going to ruin everything,"' Norwood said. '"Like, our whole family will never accept this child."'

Norwood says that Foster has refused to help her with medical bills, forcing her to to go on medicaid despite his 'vast financial resources'.


In the recently filed lawsuit, Norwood wants Foster to submit to DNA testing to prove his paternity so he can pay child support.

Norwood is seeking damages because his behavior pushing for an abortion caused her to 'suffer severe emotional distress'. She also wants a restraining order against Foster.


In response to the lawsuit, Foster filed for a gag order to be placed on Norwood who he says is planning to star in a reality show about being pregnant with his child.


On Tuesday, a judge signed an order forbidding either party from harassing each other but would not OK the gag order.

Despite the counter gag-order, Foster has remained mum on the issue and his attorney has refused to comment.


When local reporters showed up at his home yesterday, he yelled at them to get off his property.

'I'll talk to y'all when I feel it's right and it's not right man,' he told Fox 26.


Norwood was approximately 17 weeks pregnant when she filed the suit and her son is due in June.


'It's hard going to ultra-sounds and not having somebody there with you,' she said. 'I want him to love my son the way I do.'

What did this Steve Erkel looking fool think, that a beautiful young white girl just up and fell in love with him for his good looks ?....Child Please !!.....She played his dumb butt and will put a huge dent in his pocket along with a strain on his marriage and make his kids ashamed.....Nice goin' Player !!!

 

[Midnightangel]

Every child fathered by Foster deserves to be taken care of in the same capacity, regardless of who the mother is.

That's how the law looks at it and that's the way it should be.

It's his fault for not wearing a condom.

In the state of Texas, a mother can get up to 30% of what the father makes.

Foster makes 5M a year.

30% of that is 1.5M a year in child support.

I'm not saying she'll get that much but she could.

Wouldn't a condom have been cheaper?

 

[JDM]

The kid won't see shit of that money.

 

[NinerSickness]

Every child fathered by Foster deserves to be taken care of in the same capacity, regardless of who the mother is.

That's how the law looks at it and that's the way it should be.

You're right. That's how it should be on lala land where all you nanny-state, handout mentality, bleeding hearts reside. Here on planet earth, (you should visit some time) that kid deserves food, clothes, warmth & shelter. Not private school.

He / she also deserves a dad who isn't a douche & a mom who isn't a home-wrecking skank. But again, we're talking about planet earth here.

The kid won't see shit of that money.

Exactly. They never do. Saying it's about what's best for the kid is a crock of shit.

 

[ATL96Steeler]

This is how the law looks at it...and might I add, rightfully so.

Child support is about taking care of the child and that includes more than just food.

In this case the man makes 5M a year. The judge is going to award her enough money for her to live in a upscale house in an upscale neighborhood because that's what's best for the child. It's also going to be enough money to pay for private schools, etc.

Child support can be up to 30% of what the person paying for it can make. It depends upon how much you make and what your expenses are.

He's making 5M a year?

Yeah...she's going to be getting a few hundred grand a year, easy.

As well she should.

HE'S a professional football player and ALL his children deserve the same home and life - regardless of who the mother is.

Don't blame her, blame him. If he was to stupid to use a condom it's on him. He knows how it works. He had to know there were women out there looking to get pregnant to get an easy pay day - and he STILL didn't use protection.

She's going to get BANK - and she should.

Wow...but a female perspective, so I understand.

This is largely why these women will continue to prey on athletes...they know a payday is coming...are the athletes stupid? Yes...are they to blame? In part, yes.

Taking it away from sports for a second...highly paid corporate executive, has a wife and family, lives in a nice home, cars, private schools, vacations, etc. Screws around and ultimately the marriage ends in divorce...the wife and kids imo are entitled to the lifestyle he provided so whatever that costs are to sustain that lifestyle the wife should be awarded by the court. Insert pro athlete in there instead of the corp exec and the same thing should apply...That makes sense to me.

In the case of these groupie type females, or even a waitress or whatever...earns $30k a yr...hooks up with an athlete. It could be a one night stand, or a genuine relationship even...by hook or crook, the woman has a child by the athlete.

How can you justify taking this woman from a $30k a year type lifestyle to a pro athlete's lifestyle simply because SHE decided to have a child? If the athlete makes $5m a yr, absolutely the child should be taken care of, home, clothing, food, and most importantly education...and the mother's lifestyle should be upgraded as well, but not to the point where she no longer has to make a living as she was already doing.

Yes...the man can and should protect himself...with you 100% there, but you know as well as I, if a woman doesn't want to get pregnant she won't get pregnant.

You make it seem so simple...but don't forget Eve...you women are more powerful than you give credit.

 

[Oldschool739]

Wow...but a female perspective, so I understand.

This is largely why these women will continue to prey on athletes...they know a payday is coming...are the athletes stupid? Yes...are they to blame? In part, yes.

Taking it away from sports for a second...highly paid corporate executive, has a wife and family, lives in a nice home, cars, private schools, vacations, etc. Screws around and ultimately the marriage ends in divorce...the wife and kids imo are entitled to the lifestyle he provided so whatever that costs are to sustain that lifestyle the wife should be awarded by the court. Insert pro athlete in there instead of the corp exec and the same thing should apply...That makes sense to me.

In the case of these groupie type females, or even a waitress or whatever...earns $30k a yr...hooks up with an athlete. It could be a one night stand, or a genuine relationship even...by hook or crook, the woman has a child by the athlete.

How can you justify taking this woman from a $30k a year type lifestyle to a pro athlete's lifestyle simply because SHE decided to have a child? If the athlete makes $5m a yr, absolutely the child should be taken care of, home, clothing, food, and most importantly education...and the mother's lifestyle should be upgraded as well, but not to the point where she no longer has to make a living as she was already doing.

Yes...the man can and should protect himself...with you 100% there, but you know as well as I, if a woman doesn't want to get pregnant she won't get pregnant.

You make it seem so simple...but don't forget Eve...you women are more powerful than you give credit.

If he can't do the time, he shouldn't do the crime.....If he plays , he pays, and he will.....He's been had, plain and simple.....Expensive game....

 

[ATL96Steeler]

If he can't do the time, he shouldn't do the crime.....If he plays , he pays, and he will.....He's been had, plain and simple.....Expensive game....

Indeed he has....with the aid of the system. But what will end up happening if he's smart...in another year or so we'll hear about Foster being broke and bankrupt...all part of the game as you say.

 

[Midnightangel]

Wow...but a female perspective, so I understand.

This is largely why these women will continue to prey on athletes...they know a payday is coming...are the athletes stupid? Yes...are they to blame? In part, yes.

Taking it away from sports for a second...highly paid corporate executive, has a wife and family, lives in a nice home, cars, private schools, vacations, etc. Screws around and ultimately the marriage ends in divorce...the wife and kids imo are entitled to the lifestyle he provided so whatever that costs are to sustain that lifestyle the wife should be awarded by the court. Insert pro athlete in there instead of the corp exec and the same thing should apply...That makes sense to me.

In the case of these groupie type females, or even a waitress or whatever...earns $30k a yr...hooks up with an athlete. It could be a one night stand, or a genuine relationship even...by hook or crook, the woman has a child by the athlete.

How can you justify taking this woman from a $30k a year type lifestyle to a pro athlete's lifestyle simply because SHE decided to have a child? If the athlete makes $5m a yr, absolutely the child should be taken care of, home, clothing, food, and most importantly education...and the mother's lifestyle should be upgraded as well, but not to the point where she no longer has to make a living as she was already doing.

Yes...the man can and should protect himself...with you 100% there, but you know as well as I, if a woman doesn't want to get pregnant she won't get pregnant.

You make it seem so simple...but don't forget Eve...you women are more powerful than you give credit.

Yes, women are powerful.

That being said he could have avoided all this if he chooses not to cheat on his wife OR used a condom.

And yes, of course, she's partly to blame for not using birth control.

If you want to say that her way of making a living shouldn't be upgraded - fine, in which case part of child support has to include day care. Yes?

After all, he's got a wife to stay home and take care of his other kids. Yes? OK, if she's going to keep the same job she now has to pay for someone to watch her kid 8 hours a day. Well, that's another expense. An expense HE'S going to have to pay for. Have you seen the cost of daycare these days? Expensive.

The only thing working in his favor here is that he's a member of the Houston Texans and that's where this case is going to be handled. A friendly judge might give him a lower figure on child support. Or he could get a woman judge and, may God have mercy on his soul. Especially when she gets wind that he put pressure on her to have an abortion JUST so he wouldn't have to pay child support and answer for what he did. So far, he's douche bag of the year for that one.

I don't think she'll receive 30% but the judge can award that.

The courts have simply had enough of men planting seed and running away to leave the woman to take care of the child alone. Without financial help and help to supervise, that child often ends being a burden on society in some degree.

In child support cases women get awarded up to 30% of what the man makes - it's just that in this case he happens to be making 5M a year.

Your example of a CEO that got a woman pregnant works just the same. If he makes 100M a year and she can prove the kid is his, she'll get the same treatment. It's just that you never hear about it since he's not a celebrity.

 

[ATL96Steeler]

Yes, women are powerful.

That being said he could have avoided all this if he chooses not to cheat on his wife OR used a condom.

And yes, of course, she's partly to blame for not using birth control.

If you want to say that her way of making a living shouldn't be upgraded - fine, in which case part of child support has to include day care. Yes?

After all, he's got a wife to stay home and take care of his other kids. Yes? OK, if she's going to keep the same job she now has to pay for someone to watch her kid 8 hours a day. Well, that's another expense. An expense HE'S going to have to pay for. Have you seen the cost of daycare these days? Expensive.

The only thing working in his favor here is that he's a member of the Houston Texans and that's where this case is going to be handled. A friendly judge might give him a lower figure on child support. Or he could get a woman judge and, may God have mercy on his soul. Especially when she gets wind that he put pressure on her to have an abortion JUST so he wouldn't have to pay child support and answer for what he did. So far, he's douche bag of the year for that one.

I don't think she'll receive 30% but the judge can award that.

The courts have simply had enough of men planting seed and running away to leave the woman to take care of the child alone. Without financial help and help to supervise, that child often ends being a burden on society in some degree.

In child support cases women get awarded up to 30% of what the man makes - it's just that in this case he happens to be making 5M a year.

Your example of a CEO that got a woman pregnant works just the same. If he makes 100M a year and she can prove the kid is his, she'll get the same treatment. It's just that you never hear about it since he's not a celebrity.

Whatever she did or does for a living imo doesn't really matter...the point I was making is using $30k as an example...she shouldn't now have the lifestyle of a millionaire because of this child...at the same time she should be struggling either...child daycare, etc. should all be on the player.

They both made bad decisions...no question and the athlete was stupid to expose himself and his family here, but the courts are the real problem. You mentioned 30%...many years ago, my corp mentor's wife felt that he was cheating, he denied it (per norm)...after a lot of fact finding by lawyers, it was determined that he did lie about several things, but not have an affair. The wife still filed for divorce and it was granted on the wife's terms, stating that the trust was irrevocably broken...my friend ended up losing 50% of his income to child support and alimony.

He complied with the judge's order...moved out of his home, had to move into a rental because he couldn't afford to buy a lace for himself...he eventually got another attorney and a different judge (both female this time) and the initial ruling was overturned...no alimony, only child support and the mortgage on the home was his responsibility.

To your point...there should be a price to pay for mistakes, and stupidity. But not turning a $30k income earner (again just an example) into a millionaire unless she had that lifestyle already.

 

[flaraider]

I didn't say she did shit. I said it's a very real possibility. She undeniably is a gold digger who did her best to get pregnant. Should he have cheated? No. Should she profit off of him cheating? Absolutely not.

Arian Foster quote I knew something was up when the b**** got right out of bed and went and hung in gravity boots for the rest of the evening

 

[Midnightangel]

Whatever she did or does for a living imo doesn't really matter...the point I was making is using $30k as an example...she shouldn't now have the lifestyle of a millionaire because of this child...at the same time she should be struggling either...child daycare, etc. should all be on the player.

They both made bad decisions...no question and the athlete was stupid to expose himself and his family here, but the courts are the real problem. You mentioned 30%...many years ago, my corp mentor's wife felt that he was cheating, he denied it (per norm)...after a lot of fact finding by lawyers, it was determined that he did lie about several things, but not have an affair. The wife still filed for divorce and it was granted on the wife's terms, stating that the trust was irrevocably broken...my friend ended up losing 50% of his income to child support and alimony.

He complied with the judge's order...moved out of his home, had to move into a rental because he couldn't afford to buy a lace for himself...he eventually got another attorney and a different judge (both female this time) and the initial ruling was overturned...no alimony, only child support and the mortgage on the home was his responsibility.

To your point...there should be a price to pay for mistakes, and stupidity. But not turning a $30k income earner (again just an example) into a millionaire unless she had that lifestyle already.

So then what do you do?

The court looks at it the same way I do: That every child fathered by Foster is entitled to the same standard of living. It's not the child's fault that neither mom or dad used birth control.

Towards that end, the child should live in a nice house, get great health care, head to upscale schools (the same as Foster's other kids), etc.

He should also have money set aside by Foster - untouchable by mom - into a trust fund for college later in life. I'm sure Foster's other children already have theirs set.

In order to do this, mom gets a bump in living as well. She'll live in a nicer home, eat better food, etc since she's taking care of him. If you want her to keep working, OK - then he has to pay for daycare.

Another poster suggested having CPS drop by and make sure that the child is being taken care of - and I agree. We have to make sure the money is being spent on clean clothes, food, the house is being kept clean, etc instead of being used to pay for breast enhancements/liposuction/collagen, etc.

There's just simply no way to make sure the child is taken care of to that level without her benefiting from it since she's the caregiver. In short, if the child is going to live in an upscale house in an upscale neighborhood, so is she.

 

[NinerSickness]

The court looks at it the same way I do: That every child fathered by Foster is entitled to the same standard of living.

Well thank you (and the court) for helping to drag society down even lower by helping to produce more and more entitled parasites who refuse to do anything but put their hands out. Way t' go.

...and that money is for the prostitute he knocked up not for the kid.

 

[Midnightangel]

Well thank you (and the court) for helping to drag society down even lower by helping to produce more and more entitled parasites who refuse to do anything but put their hands out. Way t' go.

...and that money is for the prostitute he knocked up not for the kid.

Right. YOUR way is far, far better.

Allow men to go around getting women pregenant and have no responsibility whatsoever. :rollseyes:

And she's not getting money from the taxpayers - she's getting it from THE FATHER.

Who CHOSE not to wear a condom.

Not a single dime is coming out of YOUR pocket.

 

[SonnyCID]

Well thank you (and the court) for helping to drag society down even lower by helping to produce more and more entitled parasites who refuse to do anything but put their hands out. Way t' go.

...and that money is for the prostitute he knocked up not for the kid.

Child support works as a deterrent of unprotected sex as far I'm concerned.

 

[NinerSickness]

Right. YOUR way is far, far better.

Allow men to go around getting women pregenant and have no responsibility whatsoever. :rollseyes:

How is paying for a bitch's rent, food, utilities & the kid's clothes for 18 years no responsibility whatsoever? I don't have any problem with that. I have a problem with the rest of the ca$hing in bull shit.

And she's not getting money from the taxpayers - she's getting it from THE FATHER.

Who CHOSE not to wear a condom.

Not a single dime is coming out of YOUR pocket.

Who said anything about MY pocket?

 

[NinerSickness]

Child support works as a deterrent of unprotected sex as far I'm concerned.

In theory. But it's not exactly working out in real life is it?

 

[SonnyCID]

Works for me. The existance of herpès helps too.

 

[JDM]

Right. YOUR way is far, far better.

Allow men to go around getting women pregenant and have no responsibility whatsoever. :rollseyes:

And she's not getting money from the taxpayers - she's getting it from THE FATHER.

Who CHOSE not to wear a condom.

Not a single dime is coming out of YOUR pocket.

This kid is fucked. Not only will he have no one raising him, but he won't see shit of that money.

Being a whore is not a reason to have a court-ordered lifestyle upgrade. It doesn't matter who pays for it.

Also for the record, you don't know that he didn't wear a condom. It is far too common practice for sluts like this to deliberately break and ruin condoms for a payday.