cwalke3408
Well-Known Member
The committee has no choice but to rank A&M now
Shut up Tulsa's bitch.Duke 4-5
Southern Miss 6-3
NM State 0-9
S. Carolina 4-6
Ole Miss 4-6
Texas A&M 6-3
Tennessee 5-5
Arkansas 2-8
Up next for them is 4-5 Mississippi State and 3-7 Western Carolina before their season finale against Auburn (their final hope for one decent win all season).
Sorry but that team barely deserves the top 10, much less the top 4.
#UCFacts
And as stated, you are using a flawed system(your words) to do the comparison. So isnt your review of facts a bit subjective as well. You are comparing a UCF team that arguably was a good team in a specific year(this decades Boise St.) yet their ranking was done by same said flawed system, as we every team that was rated by same said flawed system. Then you compare them to a team two years later that is being rated in same said flawed system as well as all teams they played were rated in same said flawed system. See the flaws in your logic yet?
The committee has no choice but to rank A&M now
But could they beat Pitt or Tulsa?Duke 4-5
Southern Miss 6-3
NM State 0-9
S. Carolina 4-6
Ole Miss 4-6
Texas A&M 6-3
Tennessee 5-5
Arkansas 2-8
Up next for them is 4-5 Mississippi State and 3-7 Western Carolina before their season finale against Auburn (their final hope for one decent win all season).
Sorry but that team barely deserves the top 10, much less the top 4.
#UCFacts
Something tells me that you are well acquainted with butt hurt.Lol at the Bama butt hurt in this thread.
“I’m not butt hurt, I’ll write a whole paragraph explaining just how not butt hurt I am”
lmao
I was thinking the same
If A&M isnt ranked this week, they will be ranked after next week, after they beat a garbage South Carolina team. Gotta take that last chance to prop them up before they finish the season losing badly to UGA and LSU
[/QUOTE]How's that Indiana win working out for you. Did you guys petition the B1G office for their schedule, or did it just work out that way "naturally". they got 7 wins...but the opponents they've beaten are 17-49. If they played their schedule from last year this year, they would have 5 losses already...Nor would they be ranked with Texas A&M's schedule. Oh well, they get to pretend they are good for one more week anyways.
TriggeredSomething tells me that you are well acquainted with butt hurt.
Who cares about A&Ms strength of schedule? They lose to anyone with a pulse.
SEC teams always get propped up based on who they lose to, which is hilarious.
Speaking of pulse did I mention that Indiana has lost to anyone with a winning record by a combined score of 51-10....
....their other loss was to 4-5 Michigan St
Who has Texas A&M beat? lol
Who has Indiana beat...17-49...
Well then you should probably take some time off from posting.Triggered