Not sure if Beamer was truthful, but the vanilla playcalling was brought up on TTL and his response was basically that we have been playing with our full playbook. Sad if true.
Not sure if Beamer was truthful, but the vanilla playcalling was brought up on TTL and his response was basically that we have been playing with our full playbook. Sad if true.
If the playcalling has been vanilla this year, what the hell was it last year?
But DW4 said that we havnt and that there is a lot of stuff still yet to be put in. FWIW i'd take Wilsons word over franks (in this situation).
When did DW say this? We are going to need to open something up if Boykin and Davis aren't back at full strength. I wouldn't mind seeing JO in the backfield with DW lining up as the slot receiver.
If anything, the Morris article just ought to serve as a little extra fuel for what should be an already electric atmosphere. But at the same time, the last coach I can remember to dis Lane Stadium came out with a W after his comments. Jagz from BC.
It was on TTL the other night, basically DW said that there are formations and other things that Tech hasn't done yet. They are still adding things to the offense.It was during his interview, actually i think that is how they set the question up when they asked beamer (could be wrong about that) but 100% thats what DW said.
Cant remember it word for word but he said something like "there are some formations and things in the current formations that we havnt put in yet".
Keep talking Clemson. Between that and the ESPN lovefest for the Tigers, motivation shouldn't be much of a problem. BTW, is it supposed to rain Saturday? Because all the pre-game hype from the four-letter reminds me of the 2009 game with Miami.