Oh I never bring that shit up about the 90's or # of SBs, ever. I just find it funny when others go back, just not quite that far. you know because there is such a difference apparentlyThe 90s never happened.
I think the TRO will be granted, now beating the NFL that's another story. I'm just hoping the courts say even with all that power the NFL needs better proof of wrong doing in what should be a legal case. For strickly NFL matters the NFL should be allowed full leway, in legal matters they should have to follow legal rules.IMO there is no chance he is granted a TRO. The Brady ruling made that a lock. You have to remember this is not about guilt or innocence. The judge's opinion if he thinks Zeke got screwed or not is irrelevent. He has to rule on the fact that the league followed the appropriate rules. That is all.
Oh I never bring that shit up about the 90's or # of SBs, ever. I just find it funny when others go back, just not quite that far. you know because there is such a difference apparently
Oh I never bring that shit up about the 90's or # of SBs, ever. I just find it funny when others go back, just not quite that far. you know because there is such a difference apparently
Yep, I've learned long ago the only history that matters is that which helps their argument.Oh I never bring that shit up about the 90's or # of SBs, ever. I just find it funny when others go back, just not quite that far. you know because there is such a difference apparently
Ahhhh reminds me of Sox fans that ONLY talk about the "Last Decade"....of course when discussing titles, the late 90's dynasty is older than Jesus, but 2004 and 2007 feel like yesterday
I'm guilty of MLB history cherry picking, but only the 2017 ALCS.
I've never denied the Yankees 27WS wins.
He will get suspended for something else in the meantime.Basically it let's him play until his court case is heard.
Cowboys are one of the worst teams of this millennium. Fact.
Cowboys are one of the worst teams of this millennium. Fact.
You are cherry picking a prediction for this year?I'm guilty of MLB history cherry picking, but only the 2017 ALCS.
I've never denied the Yankees 27WS wins.
I think the TRO will be granted, now beating the NFL that's another story. I'm just hoping the courts say even with all that power the NFL needs better proof of wrong doing in what should be a legal case. For strickly NFL matters the NFL should be allowed full leway, in legal matters they should have to follow legal rules.
Yes before all the NFL CBA gives power to Goodell statements, I know about Article 46. I just dont fully agree with it.
Just so the rules are clear, please remind me how far we are allowed to go back when bringing up SBs and not criticized for bringing up the past. So the year 2000-2001 is OK based on the above, but mid 90's aren't? Or is it 3 years? 5 years?
IMO the only thing that matters is last year and that's barely even pertinent once the new season starts
Total bullshit
Guess the internet lawyers need to brush up on there studies.
Eli didn't win a SB in 2000-01.
It's a stupid discussion to have but if there needs to be some sort of parameter I would put it at 3-5 years. In my opinion that's the time frame in which most teams turn over its roster significantly enough where you could consider it a "different enough" team that makes their SB win irrelevant in a present day discussion.